Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Associations of muscle and adipose tissue parameters with long-term outcomes in middle and low rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Cancer Imaging volume 23, Article number: 5 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the role of preoperative body composition analysis for muscle and adipose tissue distribution on long-term oncological outcomes in patients with middle and low rectal cancer (RC) who received curative intent surgery.

Methods

A total of 155 patients with middle and low rectal cancer who underwent curative intent surgery between January 2014 and December 2016 were included for the final analysis. Skeletal muscle area (SMA), skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMD), visceral fat area (VFA) and mesorectal fat area (MFA) were retrospectively measured using preoperative CT images. To standardize the area according to patient stature, SMA was divided by the square of the height (m2) and the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI, cm2/m2) was obtained. Each median values of the distribution in male and female served as cut-off point for SMI, SMD, VFA, and MFA, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the association between body composition and long-term oncological outcomes. Overall survival (OS) measured in months from the day of primary surgery until death for any cause. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the interval between surgery and tumor recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank testing was used to validate prognostic biomarkers. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility for SMA, SMD, MFA,VFA.

Results

During the follow-up period, 42 (27.1%) patients had tumor recurrence; 21 (13.5%) patients died. The sex-specific median value of SMI was 28.6 cm2/m2 for females and 48.2 cm2/m2 for males. The sex-specific median value of SMD was 34.7 HU for females and 37.4 HU for males. The sex-specific median value of VFA was 123.1 cm2 for females and 123.2 cm2 for males. The sex-specific median value of MFA was 13.8 cm2 for females and 16.0 cm2 for males. In the Cox regression multivariate analysis, SMI (P = 0.036), SMD (P = 0.022), and postoperative complications grades (P = 0.042) were significantly different between death group and non-death group; SMD (P = 0.011) and MFA (P = 0.022) were significantly different between recurrence group and non-recurrence group. VFA did not show any significant differences. By the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank testing, DFS was significantly longer in patients with high-MFA (P = 0.028) and shorter in patients with low-SMD (P = 0.010), OS was significantly shorter in patients with low-SMI (P = 0.034) and low-SMD (P = 0.029).

Conclusions

Quantitative evaluation of skeletal muscle mass and adipose tissue distributions at initial diagnosis were important predictors for long-term oncologic outcomes in RC patients. SMD and SMI were independent factors for predicting OS in patients with middle and low rectal cancer who had radical surgery. SMD and MFA were independent factors for predicting DFS in patients with middle and low rectal cancer who had radical surgery.

Introduction

According to the latest statistics from American Cancer Society (ASC), colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States with 44,850 estimated new cases of rectal cancer (RC) in 2022 [1]. Identification of reliable and potentially modifiable factors associated with long-term oncologic outcomes is clinically important for vulnerable cancer patients. Body composition has gained increasing attention in oncology in recent years due to fact that quantitative evaluation of skeletal muscle mass and adipose tissue distributions has been revealed to offer prognostic implications for many different cancer types, including RC [2,3,4].

Sarcopenia, indicated by both loss of muscle mass (myopenia) and declining muscle function, is categorized as primary when age-associated, or secondary due to pathogenic mechanisms [5]. In some previous studies, sarcopenia was demonstrated to associate with poor outcomes in RC patients [6, 7]. Obesity has been reported as a potential risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with RC [8]. Body mass index (BMI), as an incomplete and crude indicator of total body fat, is widely used in obesity-related research, although it hardly reflects body fat distribution [9]. There is increasing evidence that visceral fat is to be favored over BMI in metabolic syndrome and cancer development [10, 11].

Computed tomography (CT) has emerged as an important tool for accurate body composition analysis of muscle and adipose tissue, because CT scan is a routine part of diagnosis and surveillance in cancers-related diseases [12]. Cross-sectional area of skeletal muscle (SMA) and visceral fat (VFA) from a single axial CT slice at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) were significantly correlated with total body skeletal muscle volume and visceral fat volume, respectively [3]. Previous studies evaluating changes in body composition and its results on RC, had mainly focused on VFA and SMA rather than the amount of mesorectal fat around rectum and the quality of skeletal muscle for oncological outcomes [4, 8, 10, 13]. Yamaoka et al. suggested that the mesorectal fat area (MFA) measured at the level of the tip of sciatic spine is a reliable predictor of whole mesorectal fat volume, while VFA measured at L3 level only represents the size of retroperitoneal, omental, mesenteric, and mesocolic adipose tissue [14]. Total mesorectal excision (TME), resection for the rectum and mesorectal fat within the mesorectal fascia, is the gold standard procedure for RC [15]. Perirectal fat, which represents adipose tissue accumulation around rectum, is a vital anatomical landmark for TME [15]. Thus, MFA perhaps has greater prognostic impacts for RC patients compared with VFA. To better define sarcopenia, the function or strength of skeletal muscle must be taken into consideration. Myosteatosis, defined as an increased infiltration by inter- and intramuscular adipose tissue, has been reported to associate with poor skeletal muscle quality, reflecting the performances of skeletal muscle function [16, 17]. Skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMD), defined as the radiodensity of skeletal muscle measured by CT, is highly correlated with direct measurement of muscle lipid content by biopsy [18]. Thus, Chan et al. suggested that myosteatosis and low SMD refer to the same physiological changes of skeletal muscle [19].

In our study, we aimed to evaluate the association between preoperative CT-based measurements of SMA (normalized for height), SMD, VFA, MFA, and the long-term clinical outcomes of middle and low RC patients who underwent curative intent surgery.

Materials and methods

This retrospective cohort study was approved by our institutional review board, and written informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study.

We present the following article in accordance with the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) reporting checklist.

Study population

343 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed RC who underwent laparoscopic radical surgery at our institution between January 2014 and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. 153 patients with upper RC (defined as partially peritonalized), 11 patients with incomplete follow-up data, 6 patients with severe organ insufficiency, 8 patients without preoperative CT examinations, 10 patients without information of weight or height, were excluded. A total of 155 patients were enrolled for the statistical analysis. The flowchart of patient selection process was summarized in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study

Full size image

Demographic and clinical variables

We gathered patient’s sex, diagnosed age, BMI, height, weight, blood carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), alone with underlying vascular risk history including diabetes, heart disease, hypertension by reviewing electronic medical records. Other baseline characteristics included are American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA), hospitalization days, intraoperative blood loss (ml), pathologic TNM tumor stage according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on colorectal cancer staging (AJCC), postoperative complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo Classification system with 1–2 considered as minor complications and 3 or higher as major complications. Overall survival (OS) measured in months from the day of primary surgery until death for any cause. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the interval between surgery and tumor recurrence, including distant metastasis and local relapse. The electronic medical records system was searched for date of death and general medical information.

Imaging protocol and body composition measurements

Non-enhanced preoperative CT examinations were conducted on a dual-source CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany). Detailed imaging parameters were as following: 120 KVp tube voltage; 150–240 mA tube current with automatic dose modulation; matrix, 512 × 512; collimation, 64 × 0.625 mm; reconstructed slice thickness, 2 mm. Iterative reconstruction algorithm was used for suppressing image noise.

Images were analyzed by using open-source software 3D Slicer 4.11 [20]. At the level of L3, where both transverse processes were visible or most clearly visible in case of scoliosis, SMA was measured by manual correcting all the abdominal wall and back muscles areas obtained from the muscle-density mask (− 30 to 150 HU). To standardize the area according to patient stature, SMA was divided by the square of the height (m2) and the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI, cm2/m2) was obtained. SMD was measured as the mean HU of SMA. From the fat-density mask (− 150 to − 50 HU), VFA was retrieved through manually tracing the abdominal muscular wall at the same L3 level. From the fat-density mask (− 150 to − 50 HU), MFA was obtained by subtracting the rectal area from the mesorectal area at the level of ischial spine with manually tracing. When the outer edge of rectal wall could not be readily visualized in a T3 tumor, we continually traced along the contour of the outer edge of rectal wall [21] (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Abdominal axal CT images of patients with quantitative measurements of SMA, SMD, VFA at the level of L3 and MFA at the level of ischial spine

Full size image

In our study, each median values of the distribution in male and female served as cut-off point for SMI, SMD, VFA, and MFA, respectively. Patients were then assigned to either the low- or high-SMI groups, low- or high-SMD groups, low- or high-VFA groups, and low- or high-MFA groups accordingly. Sarcopenia was defined as low-SMI, and myosteatosis was defined as low-SMD.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. Data were shown as means with standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables, and frequencies with percentages for categorical variables. Patients were divided into tumor recurrence group and non-recurrence group, as well as death group and non-death group during the 5-year follow-up period. Chi-squared test and Student’s t-test were performed to assess differences between categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for DFS and OS, respectively. The relationships between certain independent and dependent variables might be masked by confounding factors, so variables with relaxed P < 0.10 in univariate analysis, would be analyzed in multivariable model. Variables with p < 0.05 in the multivariate Cox model were considered significant. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were performed to evaluate the association between SMI, SMD, VFA, MFA, and OS and DFS.

All parameters (SMA, SMD, VFA, MFA) were independently measured by reviewer A. After four weeks, reviewer B randomly selected 30 patients to evaluate interobserver reproducibility. And these 30 patients were also measured by reviewer A to assess intraobserver variability. Both reviewers were unknown of clinical date. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. Reliability interpretation of ICC values were as follows: 0.91–1.0, excellent reliability; 0.75–0.90, good reliability; 0.50–0.75, moderate reliability; 0.01–0.50, none to poor reliability [22]. Correlations between BMI and VFA, MFA, SMD were analyzed using the Spearman’s correlation.

Results

Patients’ characteristics

155 patients (male/female: 99/56, mean age 61.6 ± 12.6 years) with median follow-ups of 65 months (range 7–72 months) were included for the final analysis (Table 1). The distributions for SMA, SMD, VFA and MFA were shown in Fig. 3. The sex-specific median value of SMI was 28.6 cm2/m2 for females and 48.2 cm2/m2 for males. The sex-specific median value of SMD was 34.7 HU for females and 37.4 HU for males. The sex-specific median value of VFA was 123.1 HU for females and 123.2 HU for males. The sex-specific median value of MFA was 13.8 cm2 for females and 16.0 cm2 for males. During the follow-up period, 42 (27.1%) patients had tumor recurrence with 1, 3, 5 year DFS rates of 93, 75, 71%, respectively; 21 (13.5%) patients died with 1, 3, 5 year OS rates of 94, 90, 86%, respectively. Table 2 and Table 3 summarized differences of variables between groups (recurrence vs non-recurrence; death vs non-death). A significantly higher incidence of death was recorded in patients with higher weight (P = 0.028) and higher postoperative complications grades (P = 0.025).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical variables
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

The distributions for SMI, SMD, MFA, VFA in male and female

Full size image
Table 2 Comparison of general patient characteristics between groups according to cancer recurrence and survival states
Full size table
Table 3 Comparison of pathological findings between groups according to cancer recurrence and survival states
Full size table

Factors associated with OS and DFS

Univariate Cox analyses identified four prognostic factors, including BMI (P = 0.087), postoperative complications grades (P = 0.035), SMI (P = 0.042), SMD (P = 0.037) for OS, with P-values less than 0.10. Among them, SMI (P = 0.036), SMD (P = 0.022), and postoperative complications grades (P = 0.042) remained significant markers for death in multivariable analysis. However, MFA and VFA were not significant prognosis factors for death either in univariable or multivariable analyses (Table 4). In univariable Cox analyses, postoperative complications grades (P = 0.076), MFA (P = 0.032), SMD (P = 0.012) showed significant differences between recurrence and non-recurrence group. After multivariable analysis, MFA (P = 0.022), SMD (P = 0.011) still reminded statistically significant. However, VFA and SMI were not significant prognosis factors for cancer recurrence either in univariable or multivariable analyses (Table 5).

Table 4 Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), univariate and multivariate analyses
Full size table
Table 5 Prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS), univariate and multivariate analyses
Full size table

Using the Kaplan—Meier method and log-rank test, OS rather than DFS was significantly longer in patients with high-SMI compared to patients with low-SMI (P = 0.043). Both OS and DFS were significantly longer in patients with high-SMD compared to patients with low-SMD (P = 0.029, P = 0.010, respectively) (Fig. 4). DFS rather than OS was significantly longer in patients with high-MFA than patients with low-MFA (P = 0.028). No significant differences were found in OS or DFS between high-VFA group and low-VFA group (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Overall survival or disease-free survival according to SMI and SMD, respectively

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Overall survival or disease-free survival according to VFA and MFA, respectively

Full size image

Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility

Both intraobserver (ICC 0.946, 95CI% 0.890–0.974) and interobserver reproducibility (ICC 0.935, 95CI% 0.870–0.969) were excellent for MFA. Both intraobserver (ICC 0.927, 95CI% 0.853–0.964) and interobserver reproducibility (ICC 0.929, 95CI% 0.856–0.966) were excellent for SMA. Both intraobserver (ICC 0.908, 95CI% 0.818–0.955) and interobserver reproducibility (ICC 0.889, 95CI% 0.780–0.946) were good for SMD.

Correlation

No correlations were observed between BMI and VFA (r = 0.052, P = 0.518), and between BMI and MFA (r = 0.106, P = 0.190), and between BMI and SMD (r = − 0.082, P = 0.313).

Discussion

In our study, lower SMI was only a negtive prognostic factor for OS in patients with middle and low RC who received radical surgery, and it had no significant impact on DFS. Lower SMD showed a significant negtive impact both for OS and DFS. VFA failed to show any significant impact both for OS and DFS. MFA was an independent predictor of DFS but not of OS. These results suggested that quantitative evaluation of skeletal muscle mass and adipose tissue distributions at the time of diagnosis is a crucial factor affecting long-term oncologic outcomes.

In accordance with our results, sarcopenia (actually refers to myopenia, the same below) had been reported to be predictive of OS but not of DFS in patients undergoing oncological rectal surgery in many other studies [4, 7]. On the other hand, several lines of evidence showed a significant impact of sarcopenia on OS as well as DFS [23, 24]. In the C SCANS study, sarcopenia was demonstrated to be an independent predictor for a decreased DFS and OS in non-metastatic CRC [23]. In patients undergoing excision of colorectal liver metastases, Vledder et al. discovered that sarcopenia was strongly linked to poorer OS and DFS [24]. In contrast, Nakanishi et al. analyzed 494 patients with stage I–IV CRC，neither OS nor DFS was significantly correlated with sarcopenia [25]. These conflicting results regarding the survival impact of sarcopenia on patients with RC might be partially due to the different ethnicities of study populations. The prevalence of sarcopenia varied considerably according to different ethnicities and cut-off point [26]. Of the 2470 patients included in a American population-based study.

(C SCANS study), 1078 (44%) were classified as having sarcopenia [23]. Of the 494 patients included in a Japanese population-based study (Nakanishi et al.), 298 (60%) had sarcopenia [25]. These studies used the L3-SMI to define sarcopenia with identical cut-off point (38.5 cm2/m2 for females and 52.4 cm2/m2 for male).

The loss of muscle mass might be not always observed in cross-sectional area, since CT scan could not differentiate fatty tissue from muscle tissues, decreased muscle mass and increased intramuscular fat accumulation might be regarded as normal SMA when measured by CT. Myosteatosis, referred to inter- and intramuscular fat accumulation, had been reported to reflect muscle strength and quality [16, 17]. Myosteatosis seemed to occur independently of muscle mass depletion and perhaps worked synergistically [18]. Therefore, myosteatosis rather than myopenia might be a better predictor for adverse oncological outcomes in RC patients. Our results revealed that myosteatosis (lower SMD) was a marker for worse OS as well as DFS, while myopenia had no significant impact on DFS. These were consistent with several previous studies that showed a negative impact of myosteatosis on long-term clinical outcomes among CRC patients [19, 27]. The exact physiological mechanism of increased myosteatosis had remained largely unclear, although some theories have been suggested. For example, Malietzis et al. identified a connection between systemic inflammatory response and myosteatosis in patients with CRC, implying that higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an independent risk factor for myosteatosis [28]. Other theories included mitochondrial dysfunctions, leptin signaling defectiveness, neuromuscular changes contributing to decreased regenerative capacity, and the involvement of fibroadipogenic precursor cells [29,30,31,32]. Some hypotheses have also been proposed to explain the relationship between myosteatosis and long-term prognosis for cancer patients. Skeletal muscle is the largest site for insulin-dependent glucose storage. Free fatty acids and inter- or intramuscular fat accumulation according to Dresner et al. can cause insulin resistance in human skeletal muscle by inhibiting glucose transport activity [33]. There is mounting evidence that cardiometabolic diseases are related to myosteatosis and insulin resistance, and both have important roles in disease development [34]. The pathogenesis of myosteatosis and its association with prognostic survival in patients with RC should be subjected to further investigation, since the suitable interventions either before or after treatment may enhance these patients’ quality of life.

Obesity was found to be a protective factor for patients with CRC in certain studies, but it was also associated with a higher risk of overall mortality for various diseases in others. This phenomenon is called the obesity paradox [9]. One possible explanation for these inconsistent results was that most studies used BMI as their main criterion for evaluating obesity. However, BMI can’t tell the difference between muscle and fat mass, hardly reflecting adipose tissue distribution [9]. Previous studies reported that exact adipose tissue distribution measured by CT was associated with oncologic outcomes both positively and negatively [35]. Subcutaneous fat tissue (SFT) appeared to be a protective factor against adverse prognosis; on the other hand, visceral fat tissue (VFT) did correlate with increased cancer-related mortality [36]. In our study, BMI, as well as VFA, failed to show any significant impact on long-term outcomes for RC patients. This result might come from different study population selections. Our study included all patients diagnosed with middle and low RC regardless of tumor staging and therapeutic schedule, while others did not [35, 37].

Surgery for middle and low RC is performed within the narrow pelvic cavity and requires precise TME, it is considered to be even more affected by visceral obesity. Smaller mesorectal volume possibly indicates a smaller distance between the mesorectal fascia and tumor, which means that the tumor has a high tendency to invade mesorectal fascia or adjacent organs. Mesorectal fat is a barrier to the spread of tumor locally, and has a protective effect against intra-mesorectal lymph node micrometastases. Therefore larger mesorectal volume could reduce the chance of residual tumor after TME surgery [21, 38]. Dilek et al. also reported that mesorectal volume could be utilized as an independent and new biomarker for predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced RC, and that response-positive individuals had a greater mesorectal volume [39]. Our findings of better DFS with higher MFA might be because TME surgery and preoperative radiotherapy have an overall effect on local cancer control, and survival is mainly determined by distant metastases.

There are several limitations to our study. First, this was a single-center retrospective study with a potential selection bias. 35 cases (18.4%) were excluded from our study due to incomplete follow-up data, severe organ insufficiency, and lack of a preoperative CT scan. Nevertheless, our study still included considerable eligible patients withI- IV tumor stage in the final analyses. Second, myosteatosis was measured by CT in our study, although this widely used imaging tool could not directly assess the location of intramyocellular or extramyocellular fat storage. Still, the radiation attenuation of muscle was highly correlated with direct measurement of muscle lipid content by biopsy and wildly used in myosteatosis-related research [18, 19]. Third, compared with the whole mesorectal volume measured at the level of ischial spine in our study, the amount of fat at the tumor’s level might play a different role for patient outcomes. And this has to be further investigated.

Conclusions

Quantitative evaluation of skeletal muscle mass and adipose tissue distributions at initial diagnosis were important factors for long-term oncologic outcomes in RC patients. SMD and SMI were independent factors for predicting OS in patients with middle and low rectal cancer who had radical surgery. SMD and MFA were independent factors for predicting DFS in patients with middle and low rectal cancer who had radical surgery.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

BMI:

Body mass index

CEA:

Carcino-embryonic antigen

CCRTx:

Chemoradiation therapy

CT:

Computed tomography

DFS:

Disease-free survival

MFA:

Mesorectal fat area

OS:

Overall survival

RC:

Rectal cancer

SMD:

Skeletal muscle radiodensity

SMI:

Skeletal muscle index

TNM:

Tumor-node-metastasis

VFA:

Visceral fat area

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee KH, Kang BK, Ahn BK. Higher visceral fat area/subcutaneous fat area ratio measured by computed tomography is associated with recurrence and poor survival in patients with mid and low rectal cancers. Int J Color Dis. 2018;33(9):1303–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hilmi M, Jouinot A, Burns R, Pigneur F, Mounier R, Gondin J, et al. Body composition and sarcopenia: the next-generation of personalized oncology and pharmacology? Pharmacol Ther. 2019;196:135–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Han J, Ryu H, Park I, Kim K, Shin Y, Kim S, et al. Association of body composition with long-term survival in non-metastatic rectal cancer patients. Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(2):563–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Gülistan B, Jürgen B, Yves B, Olivier B, Tommy C, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cespedes Feliciano E, Avrutin E, Caan B, Boroian A, Mourtzakis M. Screening for low muscularity in colorectal cancer patients: a valid, clinic-friendly approach that predicts mortality. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018;9(5):898–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi M, Oh S, Lee I, Oh S, Won D. Sarcopenia is negatively associated with long-term outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018;9(1):53–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aytac E, Lavery IC, Kalady MF, Kiran RP. Impact of obesity on operation performed, complications, and long-term outcomes in terms of restoration of intestinal continuity for patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(6):689–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prado CM, Gonzalez MC, Heymsfield SB. Body composition phenotypes and obesity paradox. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015;18(6):535–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cakir H, Heus C, Verduin W, Lak A, Doodeman H, Bemelman W, et al. Visceral obesity, body mass index and risk of complications after colon cancer resection: a retrospective cohort study. Surgery. 2015;157(5):909–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes. Int J Color Dis. 2016;31(10):1701–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zopfs D, Theurich S, Große Hokamp N, Knuever J, Gerecht L, Borggrefe J, et al. Single-slice CT measurements allow for accurate assessment of sarcopenia and body composition. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(3):1701–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hopkins JJ, Reif RL, Bigam DL, Baracos VE, Sawyer MB. The impact of muscle and adipose tissue on long-term survival in patients with stage I to III colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(5):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamaoka Y, Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y, et al. Mesorectal fat area as a useful predictor of the difficulty of robotic-assisted laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(2):557–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Knol J, Keller DS. Total mesorectal excision technique-past, present, and future. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2020;33(3):134–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamaguchi YKT, Okumura S, Fujimoto Y, Ogawa K, Mori A, Hammad A, et al. Impact of quality as well as quantity of skeletal muscle on outcomes after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2015;20(11):1413–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perkisas S, Lamers S, Degerickx R, Mieghem EV, Cock A. The relation between mortality, intramuscular adipose tissue and sarcopenia in hospitalized geriatric patients. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018;9(6):801–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aoi W, Rittweger J, Feng HZ, Addison O, Rosen CJ. Myosteatosis in the context of skeletal muscle function deficit: an interdisciplinary workshop at the national institute on aging. Front Physiol. 2020;11:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chan ML, Kang J. Prognostic impact of myosteatosis in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11(5):1270–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, et al. 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1323–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boyle K, Chalmers A, Finan P, Sagar P, Burke D. Morphology of the mesorectum in patients with primary rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(6):1122–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Feliciano EC, Kroenke CH, Meyerhardt JA, Prado CM, Bradshaw PT, Kwan ML, et al. Association of systemic inflammation and sarcopenia with survival in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer: results from the C SCANS study. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(12):e172319.

  24. Vledder M, Levolger S, Ayez N, Verhoef C, Ijzermans J. Body composition and outcome in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2012;99(4):1021–2.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nakanishi R, Oki E, Sasaki S, Hirose K, Jogo T, Edahiro K, et al. Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of complications after colorectal cancer surgery. Surg Today. 2017;48(2):151–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Petermann-Rocha F, Balntzi V, Gray SR. Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(1):86–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Horii N, Yu S, Kumamoto T, Tsuchiya N, Endo I. Impact of intramuscular adipose tissue content on short- and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: a retrospective analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2020;18(1):68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Malietzis G, Currie AC, Athanasiou T, Johns N, Anyamene N, Glynne-Jones R, et al. Influence of body composition profile on outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Sur. 2016;103(5):572–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Koteish A, Diehl AM. Animal models of steatosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2001;21(1):089–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Farup J, Madaro L, Puri P, Mikkelsen U. Interactions between muscle stem cells, mesenchymal-derived cells and immune cells in muscle homeostasis, regeneration and disease. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1830.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Takano Y, Kobayashi H, Yuri T, Yoshida S, Naito A, Kiyoshige Y. Fat infiltration in the gluteus minimus muscle in older adults. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:1011–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bournat JC, Brown CW. Mitochondrial dysfunction in obesity. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2010;17(5):446–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dresner A, Laurent D, Marcucci M, et al. Effects of free fatty acids on glucose transport and IRS-1\u2013associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity. J Clin Invest. 1999;103(2):253–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hong SH, Choi KM. Sarcopenic obesity, insulin resistance, and their implications in cardiovascular and metabolic consequences. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(2):494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nattenmüller J, Böhm J, Bagdassarjan A, Kulu Y, Gigic B, Schneider M, et al. CT-quantified adipose tissue distribution: risk or protective factor for complications after rectal Cancer surgery? Obes Facts. 2019;12(3):259–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Passaro A, Miselli MA, Sanz JM, Dalla Nora E, Morieri ML, Colonna R, et al. Gene expression regional differences in human subcutaneous adipose tissue. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cetin D, Gaelle N. Obesity in the elderly: more complicated than you think. Cleve Clin J Med. 2014;81(1):51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sprenger T, Rothe H, Becker H, Beissbarth T, Liersch T. Lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy: impact of intramesorectal distribution and residual micrometastatic involvement. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(8):1283–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dilek O, Akkaya H, Parlatan C, Koseci T, Tas Z, Soker G, et al. Can the mesorectal fat tissue volume be used as a predictive factor in foreseeing the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectum cancer? A CT-based preliminary study. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46(6):2415–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This manuscript received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, 248-252 N, Dong Street, Quanzhou City, Fujian Province, China

    Jiyang Liu, Xueqing Huang & Jieyun Chen

  2. Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 34 N, Zhong-Shan-Bei Street, Quanzhou City, Fujian Province, China

    Xiongfeng Yu & Qingquan Lai

Authors
  1. Jiyang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiongfeng Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xueqing Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qingquan Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jieyun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JYL and XFY drafted the manuscript; JYL and XQH collected date; QQL and JYC interpreted the data and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qingquan Lai or Jieyun Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee of Fujian Medical University in view of the retrospective nature of the study and all the procedures being performed were part of the routine care.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Yu, X., Huang, X. et al. Associations of muscle and adipose tissue parameters with long-term outcomes in middle and low rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer Imaging 23, 5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00514-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00514-x

Keywords

Cancer Imaging

ISSN: 1470-7330

Contact us