Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Early response assessment and prediction of overall survival after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

Cancer Imaging volume 20, Article number: 57 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Response after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be evaluated using anatomical imaging (CT/MRI), somatostatin receptor imaging ([68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT), and serum Chromogranin-A (CgA). The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the role of these response evaluation methods and their predictive value for overall survival (OS).

Methods

Imaging and CgA levels were acquired prior to start of PRRT, and 3 and 9 months after completion. Tumour size was measured on anatomical imaging and response was categorized according to RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake was quantified in both target lesions depicted on anatomical imaging and separately identified PET target lesions, which were either followed over time or newly identified on each scan with PERCIST-based criteria. Response evaluation methods were compared with Cox regression analyses and Log Rank tests for association with OS.

Results

A total of 44 patients were included, with median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 26–36 months) and median OS of 39 months (IQR 32mo-not reached)d. Progressive disease after 9 months (according to RECIST 1.1) was significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 9.04 (95% CI 2.10–38.85)], however not compared to patients with partial response. According to Choi criteria, progressive disease was also significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 6.10 (95% CI 1.38–27.05)] and compared to patients with partial response [HR 22.66 (95% CI 2.33–219.99)]. In some patients, new lesions were detected earlier with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging. After 3 months, new lesions on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT which were not visible on anatomical imaging, were detected in 4/41 (10%) patients and in another 3/27 (11%) patients after 9 months. However, no associations between change in uptake on 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT or serum CgA measurements and OS was observed.

Conclusions

Progression on anatomical imaging performed 9 months after PRRT is associated with worse OS compared to stable disease or partial response. Although new lesions were detected earlier with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake, and serum CgA after PRRT were not predictive for OS in this cohort with limited number of patients and follow-up time.

Background

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for patients with metastatic or unresectable neuroendocrine tumours (NET) significantly increases progression free survival compared to conventional treatment and is expected to increase overall survival (OS) as well [1]. Mainly grade I and II NETs are treated with PRRT, since these tumours generally overexpress the PRRT target somatostatin receptor. Typically the treatment consists of four administrations of 7.4 GBq [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE with 6–12 week intervals. Treatment response after PRRT can be determined using several different parameters: (1) anatomical changes measured on CT or MR imaging, (2) changes in uptake of [68Ga]Gallium-labeled somatostatin analogues (68Ga-SSA), or (3) change in tumour marker serum Chromogranin-A (CgA) levels [2]. Each of these three methods has its own advantages and drawbacks. Firstly, tumour size measurements on anatomical imaging is often performed according to the well-defined and reproducible Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1) [3]. However, since NETs are slow-growing, there is a debate whether response or progression according to RECIST 1.1 is the right parameter [4]. To better differentiate the response of patients or tumour lesions, the more stringent Choi criteria for changes in tumour size (originally developed for slow-growing gastrointestinal stromal tumours) can be applied to NETs [5,6,7]. In addition, the presence of new bone lesions are often not observed with anatomical imaging, whereas [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT is able to visualize bone lesions from a certain diameter. Secondly, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of NETs [8]. Several PRRT studies have been performed to correlate baseline [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake to response (Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and change on anatomical imaging) of the same lesion [9,10,11]. However, whether changes in [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake after PRRT on a patient level predicts survival is still unknown. Response monitoring using changes in [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake is also challenging since reduced tracer uptake could indicate a smaller number of somatostatin receptor (SSTRs) either due to disease progression (e.g., more SSTR-negative NET-cells or therapy response by a decline in the number of cells), or other parameters such as changes in perfusion. Thirdly, CgA levels are easily obtained, but have a moderate sensitivity and specificity in the follow-up setting for recurrence and/or progression [12]. The relationship between CgA and tumour load, however, remains debatable.

For clinicians and patients, the most important outcome concerning response assessment is the association with OS and determination of eligibility for treatment with subsequent cycles of PRRT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of anatomical- and receptor imaging and CgA level determination in PRRT response evaluation and their predictive value for OS.

Materials and methods

Patients and PRRT

Patients were considered suitable for PRRT in case of advanced well-differentiated NET grade 1–3 (confirmed by histopathology), with sufficient SSTR expression, as visualised by uptake on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT. [18F]FDG PET/CT was performed to exclude patients for treatment with PRRT in case of presence of tumour lesions with increased metabolic activity without (increased) SSTR expression. MRI or contrast-enhanced CT, acquired in a different imaging session, were performed to assess changes in tumour size. Patients had to be in good condition according to WHO grade 0–1. Haematological parameters had to be above the following limits: Hb ≥5.5 mmol/L, leukocyte count ≥3.0 × 109/L, neutrophil granulocyte count ≥1.0 × 109/L, platelet count ≥75 × 109/L. In addition, liver function and renal function should be adequate (total bilirubin ≤30 μmol/L, serum albumin ≥30 g/L, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥50 ml/min/1.73m2). Renal outflow obstruction was excluded by [99mTc]Technetium-MAG3 renal scintigraphy. Long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs) were discontinued four to 6 weeks before every treatment and short-acting SSAs for at least 24 h. A standard dosage of 7.4 GBq [177Lu]Lutetium-DOTA-TATE ([177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE) was administered four times at ten-week intervals. If deemed necessary due to subacute haematotoxicity, adjusted activity (3.7 or 5.5 GBq [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE) was administered or next cycle was postponed until acceptable recovery of haematological parameters. All patients gave informed consent to use their data from routine clinical care for research purposes. Patients were selected consecutively, but were excluded from analysis in case of any other oncological treatments except for cold somatostatin analogues (SSA therapy) prior to the response assessment at 3 months after the last [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE treatment, other tumours than NETs and in case of absence of follow-up scans in this time interval. If other therapies were applied between 3 and 9 months after PRRT, only the 9-month response assessment was excluded.

Baseline and therapy evaluation

Baseline imaging included [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT within 6 months and morphological imaging (CT or MRI) within 2 months prior to start of PRRT according to clinical protocol. Laboratory parameters, including serum CgA levels were determined within 1 month prior to therapy start. Follow-up PET/CTs were performed in each patient at 3 months (accepted range 1–6 months) and 9 months (accepted range 6–12 months) after the fourth PRRT cycle according to local clinical protocol. Anatomical imaging and CgA level measurements were performed as close as possible to PET/CT imaging. PET/CT imaging was performed 45 min after the intravenous administration of 100 MBq of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. Acquisition parameters included 3 min/bed from base of skull to mid-tights on Gemini ToF PET/CT systems (Philips, Best, The Netherlands) with 4x4x4mm voxel BLOB-OS-TF reconstruction. Low-dose CTs were additionally acquired for attenuation correction and anatomical correlation. SSA therapy was not withheld prior to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE imaging [13]. Contrast-enhanced (CE) CT imaging of thorax and/or abdomen was performed. If liver metastases were better visualized by MRI, contrast-enhanced MRI acquisitions of the liver only with mDixon, T2, and DWI sequences were performed.

Image analysis

Target lesions were measured and classified on anatomical imaging, preferably CECT otherwise MRI, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria on baseline and 3 and 9 month follow-up scans [3]. The change in sum of diameters was additionally evaluated according to Choi criteria: increase ≥10% was classified as progression, decrease ≥10% as response, and in between as stable disease [5]. Measurements on anatomical imaging were performed in Vue PACS (Carestream, Rochester, NY) by an experienced radiologist (MJL) blinded for the clinical and PET/CT data.

[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake in RECIST 1.1 target lesions was measured and expressed in the standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SULmax and SULpeak) according to EANM guidelines [14]. Next, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT scans were quantified using different methods based on PERCIST [15]. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT target lesions were, independent of lesion size, identified using two methods: I) the most intense lesions at baseline were measurement on baseline and follow-up scans (‘Follow-up’) and II) the most intense lesions were defined on each scan individually (‘Independent’). PET target lesions were classified based on locations (liver, bone, soft tissue) with a maximum of two lesions per location and a total of five target lesions were identified using both methods ‘Follow-up’ and ‘Independent. In addition, also the single lesion with the highest uptake was noted. As a result, four categories were created: Follow-up5, Follow-up1, Independent5, and Independent1. The sum of SUL was used for comparison between baseline and follow-up scans in both Follow-up5 and Independent5. SUL measurements (DMH, EAA) were performed using the Image Computing Platform 3D Slicer (version 4.10).

In addition to tumour growth, the appearance of new lesions alone also indicates disease progression. Since cut-off values of tumour growth in NET are under discussion, the significance of new lesion detection was investigated separately by noting the absence or presence of new lesions on each scan compared to baseline.

Data analysis

OS in months was determined from the start of PRRT until death from any cause or censured at last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare median OS and inverse Kaplan-Meier was used to determine the follow-up time. Associations between imaging parameters, CgA levels and OS were evaluated using Cox survival analysis and Log Rank tests. Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed to assess the correlation between two evaluation methods. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS (version 22, IBM, Armonk, NY) and PRISM (GraphPad, San Diego, CA).

Results

A total of 44 patients were included in this retrospective study and all patients completed four cycles of PRRT. The average age at start of PRRT was 63.0 ± 9.6 years and 47.7% of patients were male. The median time between the baseline [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and anatomical imaging modality and the first PRRT administration was 1.5 months [IQR 1-3mo] and 1 month [IQR 0-1mo], respectively. The median cumulative activity over four cycles was 29.7 GBq [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE [IQR 29.3–29.9 GBq] and the median follow-up time was 31 months [IQR 26-36mo]. Median OS was 39 months [IQR 32mo-not reached] and 12 (27.3%) patients died during follow-up (Fig. 1a). CECT scans were performed in 41/44 patients, whereas 3/44 patients received baseline and follow-up MRI scans of the liver. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT was performed in 41/44 patients (93.3%) after 3 months and in 27/44 patients (61.4%) after 9 months. All patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. In four patients only the 3-month time point was included due to radioembolisation treatment with [166Ho]Holmium-microspheres between 3 and 9 months after PRRT.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival (a), and response according to RECIST 1.1 (b-c) and Choi (d-e)

Full size image
Table 1 Patient characteristics and number of scans performed
Full size table

Anatomical imaging assessment compared to OS

RECIST 1.1 measurement of 110 lesions was performed (62 liver lesions, 25 lymph nodes and 23 other soft tissue lesions). 81 and 66.7% of the patients showed stable disease according to RECIST 1.1 after 3 and 9 months respectively, whereas 45.2 and 33.3% of patients showed stable disease using Choi criteria (see Table 2). Median overall survival was not reached for all response groups using both RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria, therefore the mean overall survival was estimated. Both RECIST 1.1 and Choi analysis after 3 months showed no association with OS (see Fig. 1 and supplementary materials).

Table 2 Response according to RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria. Data is represented as (n (%))
Full size table

Response groups according to RECIST 1.1 determined at 9 months showed significant differences in estimated mean OS: 39 months for patients with stable disease, 32 months for patients with response and 27 months for patients with progressive disease (Log Rank, p = 0.002). Progressive disease according to RECIST 1.1 at 9 months was significantly associated with worse OS compared to patients with stable disease [Cox regression, HR 9.04 (95% CI 2.10–38.85)].

Similar, response groups according to Choi criteria determined at 9 months showed significant differences in estimated mean OS: 37 months for patients with stable disease, 42 months for patients with response and 28 months for patients with progressive disease (Log Rank, p < 0.001). Progressive disease at 9 months according to Choi criteria was associated with worse OS compared to patients with stable disease [Cox regression, HR 6.10 (95% CI 1.38–27.05)] and compared to patients with response [Cox regression, HR 22.66 (95% CI 2.33–219.99)]. Figure 1 shows the survival curves for the total population as well as divided per response group according to RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria after both 3 and 9 months.

Evaluation of the continuous variable of the cumulative size of target lesions also showed significant association between an increase in size and worse survival after 3 months [Cox regression, HR 1.041 (95% CI 1.015–1.068)] and after 9 months [Cox regression, HR 1.036 (95% CI 1.011–1.061)].

The appearance of new lesions in liver, bone and lung, detected on anatomical imaging with respect to baseline imaging, was reported in two patients (4.8%) after 3 months and in an additional three patients after 9 months, resulting in five patients (12.8%) with new lesions after 9 months. However, in this small group, no association between the presence of new lesions and OS was found (Fig. 2a-b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curves of new lesions detected on CT/MRI (a-b) or [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT (c-d)

Full size image

[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT analysis compared to OS

A total of 189 PET target lesions were segmented on baseline [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT (77 liver lesions, 35 bone lesions and 77 ‘other’ lesion). The lesions with the highest uptake were located primarily in the liver (61.4%), followed by ‘other’ locations (27.3%) and less often in the bone (11.4%). No associations between change in uptake on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT using any of the four quantification methods and OS was observed (see supplementary materials).

New lesions in bone, liver and lung were detected in 6/41 patients (14.6%) after 3 months. An additional 3/26 patients (11.5%) showed new lesions after 9 months. Also these new lesions on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT were not associated with OS, see Fig. 2c-d.

In Fig. 3, the correlation between SULpeak measurements after 3 and 9 months is shown. There is a good correlation between image quantification after 3 and 9 months.

Fig. 3
figure 3

SULpeak differences after 3 and 9 months with respect to baseline [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT of patients undergoing PET/CT at all three time points. Presence of new lesions on either scan 3 or 9 months is indicated with colours. Pearson correlation coefficients between both times points are (a) 0.888 with p < 0.001, (b) 0.862 with p < 0.001, (c) 0.846 with p < 0.001, and (d) 0.824 with p < 0.001

Full size image

Serum CgA evaluation compared to OS

The median CgA level at baseline was 739 μg/l [IQR 125–1746]. After 3 months, the median absolute CgA difference was − 87 μg/l [IQR − 341–16], and the percentage difference was − 15% [IQR -42–24]. At 9 months a median absolute CgA difference with respect to baseline of − 21 μg/l [IQR − 294–69] and a percentage difference of − 11% [IQR − 34–36] was observed. Neither the absolute differences in CgA nor the percentage difference after 3 or 9 months were associated with OS.

Comparison between therapy evaluation methods

All new lesions observed on anatomical imaging were also detected on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT, however not the other way around. After 3 months, 6 patients presented with new lesions on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT, of whom only 2 patients presented with the same new lesions on anatomical imaging. In one patient a new liver lesion was detected on CT, however multiple liver lesions were already visible on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT. On the other hand, no patients with new lesions on anatomical imaging alone were found. All results are shown in Table 3. After 9 months, an additional three patients showed new lesions on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT but not on anatomical imaging. One patient showed new lesions on anatomical imaging, but a [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT was not available for comparison. Meanwhile, two patients that had new lesions after 3 months on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT only showed new lesions on anatomical imaging after 9 months. In one patient different new lesions were detected (liver lesions on PET/CT and lymphadenopathy on CT), whereas in the other patient bone lesions were earlier observed on PET/CT than on CT.

Table 3 Presence or absence (N) of new lesions compared to baseline on each scan of all patients presenting with new lesions. n.a. = not acquired. 1Not visible on other imaging modality but within scan range. 2Not within scan range of other imaging modality. 3Visible on other imaging modality. 4No other imaging performed at this time point for comparison
Full size table

The response assessment methods were compared in different ways. At first, the change in size of the target lesions on anatomical imaging was compared to the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake of the same RECIST 1.1 target lesions. The change in SUL in the RECIST 1.1 lesions with the corresponding RECIST 1.1 and Choi response category is shown in waterfall plots in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, respectively. Although visually response evaluation according to Choi criteria shows improved concordance with SUL-measurements compared to RECIST 1.1 criteria, some patients classified with progressive disease still show a large decrease in SUL, whereas some patients with response still show an increase in SUL. No significant correlation was found between the percentage difference in diameter on anatomical imaging and the percentage difference in SULmax or SULpeak after 3 and 9 months (Fig. 6). Secondly, response based on the change in size of the target lesions on anatomical imaging was compared to SUL changes in separately identified PET target lesions quantified with all previously described methods. No significant association between response on anatomical imaging and change in [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake using all four quantification methods was observed. Thirdly, the percentage change in serum CgA level after 9 months and the response according to RECIST 1.1 at that time point were significantly different between the groups (p = 0.031). Patients with stable disease according to RECIST 1.1 had a decrease of CgA (median − 14.3%, IQR -30.0 - + 31.6%), responding patients also had a decrease in CgA (median − 42.3%, IQR -79.3 - -9.3%), whilst progressive patients showed an increase in CgA (median + 27.4%, IQR -11.7% - + 370.1%). There was no difference in CgA changes between Choi response groups.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Waterfall plot of RECIST 1.1 outcome (response, stable disease or progression) and change in SUL-measurements of RECIST 1.1 target lesions for (a) SULmax after 3 months, (b) SULpeak after 3 months, (c) SULmax after 9 months and (d) SULpeak after 9 months

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Waterfall plot of Choi results (response, stable disease, or progression) and change in SUL-measurements of the same target lesions after 3 months (a-b) and 9 months (c-d)

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Comparison of percentage change in SUL and size of the same lesion. Pearson correlation coefficients between both time are (a) -0.030 with p = 0.852, (b) 0.039 with p = 0.810, (c) 0.304 with p = 0.123, and (d) 0.338 with p = p0.084

Full size image

Discussion

Currently, different response assessment methods for anatomical imaging are applied in NET, mainly SWOG and/or RECIST (1.0 or 1.1) criteria [16]. In functional imaging, traditionally [111In]Indium-octreotide scans were visually assessed using the Krenning score, which compared tumour uptake with uptake in the liver and spleen/kidney [17]. However, with the introduction of SSA-labelled PET-tracers response evaluation of receptor imaging could be performed quantitatively. In current SSA-PET/CT research, tumour SUVmax is often used as a reference, but also the tumour-to-spleen and tumour-to-liver ratios are described [11, 18]. Previous studies used different selection criteria for target lesions, such as a single reference lesion with a diameter above 1.5 cm [9], a maximum of three lesions divided over four organs [18], or methods according to (modified)PERCIST [11]. The SUVpeak, as recommended by PERCIST, is used rarely in current literature and was therefore taken into consideration here. In our study, progression on anatomical imaging determined using both RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria after 9 months was associated with worse OS. Although new lesions were detected earlier with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging, changes in [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake, and serum CgA after PRRT were not predictive for OS.

Response on anatomical imaging, assessed by Choi criteria at 9 months, was associated with longer OS in this study. No association between response according to RECIST 1.1 at either time point and OS was observed, however this could be due to the low number of patients with response. The Cox survival analysis, however, was significantly different between patients with progressive disease compared to patients with stable disease after 9 months. This was also shown in other studies evaluating response within 1 year after the fourth cycle of PRRT treatment with [90Y]Yttrium-labelled and/or [177Lu]Lu-labelled compounds [19,20,21]. In addition, Vinjarmuri et al. observed that patients with both radiological, biochemical and clinical response had improved OS compared to the patients with partial response or stable disease [19]. In our study no cut-off values for change in [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake nor CgA levels were used to divide patients in response categories to allow for identification of certain threshold. The presented results, however, do not point to certain change [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake nor CgA levels that could be related with therapy response. In contrast to our study, Kong et al. did find associations between OS and response on anatomical imaging (CT), functional imaging ([111In]In-Octreotate SPECT, [68Ga]Ga-octreotate PET and [18F]FDG PET) and biochemical response using CgA levels [22]. Patients with response on all three response evaluation methods had significant improved OS. An important difference is that Kong et al. used the Krenning score for the receptor imaging modalities whereas methods inspired by PERCIST were applied in the current study. Although no ratios between normal tissue and tumour uptake were evaluated in this study, a decrease in tumour-to-spleen SUV ratio after PRRT is suggested to predict the time to progression according to RECIST 1.1 [18]. With respect to CgA, in this study the percentage change in serum CgA levels after 9 months was significantly different over all response groups according to RECIST 1.1. This is in line with the association between change in plasma CgA and tumour response according to RECIST 1.1 in 28 patients, observed by Kim et al. [23].

In this study, patients with progressive disease on anatomical imaging showed a significantly shorter OS compared to patients with stable disease for both RECIST 1.1 and Choi. It is important to notice that progressive disease is defined as either substantial growth of existing lesions and/or the appearance of new lesions. Therefore, the presence of new lesions alone was also investigated for association with OS. Although not statistically significant, again probably due to the small number of patients and short follow-up time, our results suggests that the presence of new lesions alone might be associated with a worse OS. Furthermore, new lesions were detected earlier or solely on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT in 7/10 patients, whilst in 2/10 patients new lesions were detected simultaneously on both PET/CT and separate anatomical imaging. In 1/10 patients new lesions were detected on anatomical imaging only, but no [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT was available for comparison. This suggests that [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT might be the modality of choice for detection of new lesions that have arisen during or (shortly) after PRRT indicating therapy failure, which is relevant in decision making on (future) additional cycles of PRRT. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of progression due to the appearance of new lesions on survival has not yet been studied in NET. In non-small cell lung cancer patients, however, the new-lesion status on [18F]FDG PET/CT during erlotinib treatment was a potential surrogate biomarker for survival and treatment failure, being more informative than SUV measurements [24]. Similarly, increase in size of RECIST 1.1 target lesions was not predictive for OS, whilst the appearance of new lesions and progression of non-target lesions could predict OS in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients [25].

The main limitations of this study are the small number of patients and limited follow-up time. As a result, the number of patients in our study presenting with new lesions is too small to provide any recommendations for patients presenting with new lesions after PRRT. Furthermore, most patients included in this study had grade I or grade II mid-gut NETs, of which the majority grade I which are slow growing tumours and require long follow-up times in order to observe progression of the disease. Also, the range of time between follow-up assessments is variable, which could affect the results. Although the protocol was to perform follow-up scans 3 and 9 months after PRRT, this is not always possible in routine clinical situations. Therefore, this study reflects clinical observations and these different types of progression after PRRT might warrant further investigation, as well as the role of [18F]FDG PET/CT.

PERCIST is developed and validated for [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging [15], but not for [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. Hence, other imaging analysis methods could be used for [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT assessment, for example the total tumour volume [26] or assessment of tracer distribution with texture analysis [27, 28]. However, PERCIST-like methods are easy to perform and are more likely to be adapted in the routine clinical practice. For that reason the focus in this study was on simple SUL-measurements, these have the highest chance for clinical implementation in our opinion. A disadvantage of our approach of measuring the most intense lesions on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT is that probably low grade tumours are measured. Low grade (GI/GII) tumours are likely to show more somatostatin receptor expression than high grade tumours (GIII) and therefore more [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake [29]. It might be argued that these low-grade/high-uptake lesions respond better to PRRT, therefore measuring the lesions with the highest uptake might overestimate the response of the patient as a whole, however no evidence for this is available. Finally, clinical response assessment in patients with NETs is as important as imaging and laboratory derived parameters and PRRT has shown to improve quality of life [30]. Clinical response was however beyond the scope of the current study.

Conclusion

Progression on anatomical imaging performed 9 months after PRRT is associated with worse OS compared to stable disease or partial response. Although new lesions were detected earlier with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake and serum CgA after PRRT were not predictive for OS in this cohort with limited number of patients and follow-up time.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used in this manuscript are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CE:

Contrast-enhanced

CgA:

Chromogranin-A

CI:

Confidence interval

CT:

Computed tomography

DWI:

Diffusion weighted imaging

EANM:

European Association of Nuclear Medicine

[18F]FDG:

[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose

[68Ga]Ga:

68Gallium

GBq:

Gigabecquerel

GFR:

Glomerular filtration rate

Hb:

Haemoglobin

HR:

Hazard ratio

[177Lu]Lu:

177Lutetium

MBq:

Megebecquerel

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NET:

Neuroendocrine tumours

OS:

Overall survival

PRRT:

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

IQR:

Interquartile range

RECIST:

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours

PERCIST:

Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors

PET:

Positron emission tomography

SSA:

Somatostatin analogue

SSTR:

Somatostatin receptor

SUL:

Standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass

SUV:

Standardized uptake value corrected for body weight

ToF:

Time-of-flight

References

  1. Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E, Hendifar A, Yao J, Chasen B, et al. Phase 3 trial of 177Lu-dotatate for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:125–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zaknun JJ, Bodei L, Mueller-Brand J, Pavel ME, Baum RP, Hörsch D, et al. The joint IAEA, EANM, and SNMMI practical guidance on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRNT) in neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:800–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sundin A, Rockall A. Therapeutic monitoring of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: the challenges ahead. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;96:261–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC, Macapinlac HA, Burgess MA, Patel SR, et al. Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1753–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo Y, Chen J, Huang K, Lin Y, Chen M, Xu L, et al. Early evaluation of sunitinib for the treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms via CT imaging: RECIST 1.1 or Choi Criteria? BMC Cancer. 2017;17:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo Y, Chen J, Shen B, Wang M, Cai H, Xu L, et al. CT evaluation of response in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with long-acting-repeatable octreotide: what is the optimal size variation threshold? Eur Radiol. 2018;28:5250–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh S, Poon R, Wong R, Metser U. 68Ga PET imaging in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43:802–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Öksüz MÖ, Winter L, Pfannenberg C, Reischl G, Müssig K, Bares R, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors with 90Y-DOTATOC: is treatment response predictable by pre-therapeutic uptake of 68Ga-DOTATOC? Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014;95:289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kratochwil C, Stefanova M, Mavriopoulou E, Holland-Letz T, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Afshar-Oromieh A, et al. SUV of [68Ga]DOTATOC-PET/CT predicts response probability of PRRT in neuroendocrine tumors. Mol Imaging Biol. 2014:313–8.

  11. Sharma R, Wang WM, Yusuf S, Evans J, Ramaswami R, Wernig F, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT parameters predict response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumours. Radiother Oncol. 2019;141:108–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi R, Ciafardini C, Sciola V, Conte D, Massironi S. Chromogranin a in the follow-up of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: is it really game over? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreas. 2018;47:1249–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aalbersberg EA, van der Veen BJ d W–, MWJ V, Saveur LJ, Valk GD, MET T, et al. Influence of lanreotide on uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE in patients with neuroendocrine tumours: a prospective intra-patient evaluation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:696–703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:122S–50S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Saravana-Bawan B, Bajwa A, Paterson J, McEwan AJB, McMullen TPW. Efficacy of 177Lu peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44:719–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH, Kam BL, Teunissen JJM, Kooij PPM, de Herder WW, et al. Treatment of patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tumours with the novel radiolabelled somatostatin analogue [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:417–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Haug AR, Auernhammer CJ, Wängler B, Schmidt GP, Uebleis C, Göke B, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for the early prediction of response to somatostatin receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1349–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vinjamuri S, Gilbert TM, Banks M, McKane G, Maltby P, Poston G, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Y-DOTATATE/90Y-DOTATOC in patients with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumours: assessment of response, survival and toxicity. Br J Cancer Nature Publishing Group. 2013;108:1440–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yalchin M, Oliveira A, Theocharidou E, Pencharz D, Navalkissoor S, Quigley AM, et al. The impact of radiological response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy on overall survival in patients with metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:e135–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwekkeboom DJ, De Herder WW, Kam BL, Van Eijck CH, Van Essen M, Kooij PP, et al. Treatment with the radiolabeled somatostatin analog [177Lu- DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate: toxicity, efficacy, and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2124–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kong G, Thompson M, Collins M, Herschtal A, Hofman MS, Johnston V, et al. Assessment of predictors of response and long-term survival of patients with neuroendocrine tumour treated with peptide receptor chemoradionuclide therapy (PRCRT). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1831–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim M, Lee S, Lee J, Park SH, Park JO, Park YS, et al. The role of plasma Chromogranin a as assessment of treatment response in non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48:153–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bengtsson T, Hicks RJ, Peterson A, Port RE. 18F-FDG PET as a surrogate biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib: newly identified lesions are more informative than standardized uptake value. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:530–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stein A, Bellmunt J, Escudier B, Kim D, Stergiopoulos S, Mietlowski W, et al. Survival prediction in everolimus-treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma incorporating tumor burden response in the RECORD-1 trial. Eur Urol. 2013;64:994–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gafita A, Bieth M, Krönke M, Tetteh G, Navarro F, Wang H, et al. qPSMA: semiautomatic software for whole-body tumor burden assessment in prostate cancer using 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1277–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Weber M, Kessler L, Schaarschmidt B, Fendler WP, Lahner H, Antoch G, et al. Treatment-related changes in neuroendocrine tumors as assessed by textural features derived from 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI with simultaneous acquisition of apparent diffusion coefficient. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Werner RA, Ilhan H, Lehner S, Papp L, Zsótér N, Schatka I, et al. Pre-therapy Somatostatin receptor-based heterogeneity predicts overall survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019;21:582–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Naik C, Basu S. 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with borderline low and discordant renal parameters: treatment feasibility assessment by sequential estimation of triple parameters and filtration fraction. World J Nucl Med. 2018;17:12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Strosberg J, Wolin E, Chasen B, Kulke M, Bushnell D, Caplin M, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with progressive midgut neuroendocrine tumors treated with177Lu-dotatate in the phase III NETTER-1 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2578–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Daphne M.V. Huizing and Else A. Aalbersberg are shared first author.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Daphne M. V. Huizing, Else A. Aalbersberg, Michelle W. J. Versleijen, Berlinda J. de Wit–van der Veen & Marcel P. M. Stokkel

  2. Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Margot E. T. Tesselaar

  3. Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Iris Walraven

  4. Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Max J. Lahaye

Authors
  1. Daphne M. V. Huizing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Else A. Aalbersberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michelle W. J. Versleijen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Margot E. T. Tesselaar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Iris Walraven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Max J. Lahaye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Berlinda J. de Wit–van der Veen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Marcel P. M. Stokkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DH, EA, MV, MT, BdWvdV and MS designed the study. DH and EA performed the SUL-measurements and drafted the manuscript. ML performed the RECIST 1.1 measurements. IW provided statistical support. All authors provided critical review of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daphne M. V. Huizing.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The local Institutional Review Board approved this study (METC18.0685).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1 Table S1.

Continuous variables and association with overall survival. Table S2. Categorized variables and association with overall survival. Table S3. Difference in CgA and uptake on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT between response groups according to RECIST and Choi. Table S4. Detection of new lesions and association with overall survival.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huizing, D.M.V., Aalbersberg, E.A., Versleijen, M.W.J. et al. Early response assessment and prediction of overall survival after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Cancer Imaging 20, 57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00335-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00335-w

Keywords

Cancer Imaging

ISSN: 1470-7330

Contact us