Skip to main content

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of primary cervical cancer in the detection of sub-centimetre metastatic lymph nodes

Abstract

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has limited accuracy in detecting pelvic lymph node (PLN) metastasis. This study aimed to examine the use of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in classifying pelvic lymph node (PLN) involvement in cervical cancer patients.

Methods

Fifty cervical cancer patients with pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were examined for PLN involvement by one subspecialist and one non-subspecialist radiologist. PLN status was confirmed by positron emission tomography or histology. The tumours were then segmented by both radiologists. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to test for differences between diffusion tumour volume (DTV), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), and perfusion fraction (f) in patients with no malignant PLN involvement, those with sub-centimetre and size-significant PLN metastases. These parameters were then considered as classifiers for PLN involvement, and were compared with the accuracies of radiologists.

Results

Twenty-one patients had PLN involvement of which 10 had sub-centimetre metastatic PLNs. DTV increased (p = 0.013) while ADC (p = 0.015), and f (p = 0.006) decreased as the nodal status progressed from no malignant involvement to sub-centimetre and then size-significant PLN metastases. In determining PLN involvement, a classification model (DTV + f) had similar accuracies (80%) as the non-subspecialist (76%; p = 0.73) and subspecialist (90%; p = 0.31). However, in identifying patients with sub-centimetre PLN metastasis, the model had higher accuracy (90%) than the non-subspecialist (30%; p = 0.01) but had similar accuracy with the subspecialist (90%, p = 1.00). Interobserver variability in tumour delineation did not significantly affect the performance of the classification model.

Conclusion

IVIM is useful in determining PLN involvement but the added value decreases with reader experience.

Background

The inclusion of PLN metastatic status into the recently revised International Federation of Gynaecology and Oncology (FIGO) staging system has shown to be prognostic on historical cohort, hence may better identify patients for radiation dose escalation to suspicious PLNs to improve locoregional control and survival [1,2,3,4]. In cervical cancer, MRI is used to evaluate the primary tumour extent and at the same time to assess lymph node involvement, in which the diagnosis of the latter relies on size- and morphology-based criteria on T2-weighted (T2W) images [5,6,7]. However, these criteria have shortcomings in that they are susceptible to false positives due inflammatory enlarged lymph nodes [8, 9] and false negatives due to difficulties in detecting sub-centimetre metastatic PLNs [10]. Ultimately, these criteria have resulted in low pooled sensitivity of 53–56% despite high specificity of 91–93% [11, 12].

Pathological assessment of resected lymph nodes provides definitive diagnosis; however, pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is not routinely performed in early bulky and locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated by concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) [13]. FDG-PET/CT, which has been shown to have high accuracy [11] in identifying PLN involvement, is used clinically to determine the nodal status but imparts substantial radiation burden with its high cost and limited availability. Therefore, it can be useful in identifying non-invasive imaging features of the primary tumour on MRI that are associated with the presence of PLN metastases in cervical cancer.

There has been interest in the use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to characterize the primary tumour in cervical cancer, and ADC has been shown to be associated with various clinicopathological factors such as FIGO stage, histological grade, including nodal status [14,15,16]. Previous studies have demonstrated the utility of ADC to distinguish between benign and malignant mediastinal masses as well as axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer [17, 18]. However, the diffusional signal in cervical cancer is thought to be better ascribed to the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) biexponential model and the perfusion effects are non-negligible [19,20,21]. There is growing interest in applying advanced diffusion models, such as IVIM, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to discriminate between malignant and benign masses as well as characterize tumours [22,23,24]. Specifically in the female pelvis, previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of IVIM and suggested that this technique could be used to aid in the clinical management of LACC patients [20, 25, 26].

The purpose of this study was to assess the classification performances of IVIM parameters of the primary cervical tumour in classifying PLN involvement, particularly in the detection of sub-centimetre lymph node metastasis, and to compare them with lymph node staging performance of radiologists via visual assessment.

Methods

Patients

This retrospective study was approved by and done in accordance with the regulations set by the local Institutional Review Board. This study involved anonymized human data without identifying information that has already been collected waiving the need for informed consent. Patients were retrospectively recruited from March 2012 to January 2018. Inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma LACC; FIGO stage of IB2 or higher; treatment-naïve; and who underwent either additional pre-operative FDG-PET/CT staging or subsequent PLND. A total of 50 consecutive patients were thus identified.

MRI

Patients were asked to fast at least 6 h before the examination and 20 mg hyoscine butylbromide (Buscopan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany) was given intramuscularly at the beginning of each examination to reduce bowel peristalsis. Images were acquired with a 3 T MRI system (Achieva 3.0 T TX, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) using a dedicated 16-channel phased array torso coil. All patients were imaged on the same scanner. The conventional sequences are tabulated on Table 1. DWI utilized single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging, which was acquired immediately after the axial T2W imaging. It was performed in free breathing with background body signal suppression (pre-saturation inversion recovery fat suppression) with parallel imaging and sensitivity encoding (SENSE) factor of 2. Thirteen b-values (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 150, 300, 500, 800, and 1000 s/mm2) in the axial plane encompassing 20 slices to include the entire primary tumour motion-probing gradients in three orthogonal axes.

Table 1 Summary of MRI scan parameters. CE: contrast-enhanced, DWI: diffusion-weighted imaging; FFE: fast field echo; TR/TE: repetition time/echo; TSE: turbo spin echo; SPAIR: Spectral Attenuation Inversion Recovery; SENSE: sensitivity encoding

Image analysis

Two board-certified radiologists, one subspecialist in gynae-oncological imaging (> 10 years of experience in female pelvic imaging and cross-sectional imaging) and one non-subspecialist (> 10 years of experience in cross-sectional imaging), staged patients’ PLN status by visually examining for PLN involvement using the size, morphology and signal-based criteria on T2W images and DWI [5,6,7]. In short, PLNs with short axis larger than 1 cm on T2W-MRI, round morphology and/or containing signal similar to the primary tumour was considered malignant. PLN involvement was then confirmed using FDG-avidity from pre-operative staging FDG-PET/CT or subsequent histological findings from PLND (Figs. 1 and 2). Any FDG uptake more than the background liver activity along the pelvic nodal chain was considered positive [27].

Fig. 1
figure1

A case of a 69-year-old patient International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staged IIA with a sub-centimetre pelvic lymph nodes on parametric maps of (a) axial fused 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) image and (b) axial T2-weighted (T2W) image. This patient was classified as metastatic by the IVIM models and correctly staged by the subspecialist but not the non-subspecialist.

Fig. 2
figure2

A case of a 67-year-old patient International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staged IIIB with a sub-centimetre pelvic lymph node on parametric maps of (a) coronal fused 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) image and (b) axial T2-weighted image. This patient was classified as metastatic by the IVIM models and correctly staged by the subspecialist but not the non-subspecialist.

Volumes of interest (VOIs) were manually drawn by both radiologists to encompass the entirety of primary tumours on the b1000 images with reference to co-registered T2W images and ADC maps. Areas of hyperintensity on the b1000 maps were taken as the primary tumour and radiologists segmented the tumour with reference to co-registered T2W images and ADC maps. These VOIs were then copied to co-registered parametric maps. IVIM maps were visually inspected and VOIs were adjusted if needed (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Representative example of the placement of region of interest in the parametric maps of (a) T2-weighted image, (b) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), (c) pure diffusion coefficient (D), and (d) perfusion fraction (f) on a case of a 66-year old patient International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staged IIA2. This was repeated on subsequent slices to include the entire tumour volume.

DWI analysis

The monoexponential model of DWI was based on the geometric averaged DWI signal from three orthogonal axes. ADC map was calculated with 2 b-values (0, 1000 s/mm2) using the function:

$$ \frac{S_b}{S_0}=\exp \left(-b\bullet \mathrm{ADC}\right) $$
(1)

where Sb represents the mean signal intensity with the diffusion gradient, b, S0 is the mean signal intensity when b = 0 s/mm2. Diffusion tumour volume (DTV) was calculated by multiplying the tumour areas on b1000 images by the slice thickness.

The biexponential model, IVIM, was analysed using all 13 b-values acquired and parametric maps of D, f, and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) were generated using the biexponential model described by the function:

$$ \frac{S_b}{S_0}=f\exp \left(-b\left(D+{D}^{\ast}\right)\right)+\left(1-f\right)\exp \left(-b\bullet \mathrm{D}\right) $$
(2)

A 3 × 3 gaussian smoothing filter was first applied for pre-processing before fitting using non-linear least squares with non-negative constraints under a Levenberg-Marquardt routine by an in-house algorithm in MATLAB (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). The two-step approach was implemented by estimating D first, then followed by f and D*. Incorrectly fitted pixels with pixel values of ADC and D > 3 × 10− 3 mm2/s, and f > 1 were excluded from analysis [28, 29]. Mean values of the parameters ADC, D, and f were then calculated and considered for subsequent analysis. D* was excluded from further analysis due to low signal-to-noise ratio [28, 30].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were executed in R version 3.2.3 (R Development Core Team).

Primary tumour associations with nodal status

The cohort was stratified into three groups: patients with no nodal involvement, patients with nodal involvement but whose largest PLN had a short axis of less than 1 cm on T2W images (sub-centimetre involvement), and patients with at least one PLN larger than 1 cm (size-significant involvement). Kruskal-Wallis tests were then used to test for ADC and IVIM parameter differences between the nodal involvement groups and Nemenyi tests for pairwise comparisons between groups.

The Fisher’s exact test was used to test for associations between PLN involvement with histological sub-type and with FIGO stage.

Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility

Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) analysis was used to assess interobserver variability of ADC and IVIM parameters quantified from the VOIs of both radiologists. ICC measures agreement and ranges from 0 to 1, where values between 0.50–0.75 are considered moderate, 0.76–0.90 are considered good, and above 0.90 are considered excellent agreement [31].

Classification models of PLN staging

A logistic regression model based on IVIM histogram features derived from the VOIs of the subspecialist was developed to classify PLN involvement (regardless of PLN size) where up to 2 features were selected [32]. Feature selection was executed using stepwise forward regression. To test for the effect of interobserver variation in manual segmentation, the developed model was fitted on features derived from the VOIs of the non-subspecialist.

Model performance were compared to the performances of the radiologists’ nodal staging. The models were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Relative performance of the models was assessed by computing the Z-statistic of the accuracy confidence intervals of each model’s accuracy, i.e. the degree of CI overlap between of two models’ accuracies, using the IVIM classification model based on the VOIs of the subspecialist as reference [33].

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics

The median age of patients was 54 (28–78) years old. Thirty-five patients were of the SCC sub-type and the remaining 15 were of the adenocarcinoma sub-type. Eighteen patients were FIGO stage IB, 5 were FIGO stage IIA, 10 were stage IIB, 2 were FIGO stage IIIA, 14 were FIGO stage IIIB, and 1 was FIGO stage IVB. There was an average of 12.8 days between the MRI scan and FDG-PET/CT or PLND. Pelvic lymph node assessment by FDG-PET/CT was done in 41 patients, while 9 patients had PLND. Twenty patients were found to have PLN involvement by FDG-PET/CT assessment. One PLND candidate was found to have PLN involvement. Of the 21 patients with PLN involvement, 10 had sub-centimetre involvement. The mean DTV was 37.68 (0.95–193.58) cm3. There were no associations between PLN involvement with histological sub-type (p = 0.074) and FIGO staging (p = 0.254).

Tumour characteristics

DTV increased while ADC, D, and f decreased as the nodal status progressed from no malignant involvement to sub-centimetre and then size-significant PLN involvement, though the differences in D among the different groups were not significant (Table 2 and Fig. 4). Pairwise group comparisons may be found on Fig. 4. Interobserver variability of ADC, D, and f, were excellent (ICC = 0.961, 0.947, and 0.943 respectively).

Table 2 Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameter values of the primary tumour between patients without nodal involvement, those with sub-centimetre involvement, and those with size-significant involvement. ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient (x 10− 3 mm2/s); D: pure diffusion coefficient (x 10− 3 mm2/s); f: perfusion fraction. PLN: pelvic lymph node
Fig. 4
figure4

Boxplots of the diffusion tumour volume (DTV), perfusion fraction (f), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and pure diffusion coefficient (D) measurements of the primary tumour separated by nodal involvement with pairwise group comparisons.

PLN staging

Tabulated diagnostic performances of radiologists may be found in Table 3. The optimal IVIM classification model consisted of DTV and f. Classification accuracy of the IVIM classification model to determine PLN involvement regardless of size was similar to the diagnostic accuracies of subspecialist and non-subspecialist (Table 3). However, the IVIM model correctly identified 9 of the 10 patients with sub-centimetre PLN involvement, which gave it the same performance as the subspecialist (p = 1.00) but better performance that the non-subspecialist (p = 0.01) (Table 4). The performance of the classification model was not susceptible to interobserver variation in the manual segmentation of the primary tumour.

Table 3 Pelvic lymph node involvement classification performances of the radiologists as well as the classification performances of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) classification models. The p-values of the relative classification performances of each model are given where the first IVIM classification model served as the reference. The first IVIM model used parameters dervied from the subspecialist’s tumours segmentations, and the second IVIM model used parameters dervied from the non-subspecialist’s tumour segementations. VOI: Volume of Interest
Table 4 Patients with sub-centimetre metastatic pelvic lymph node (PLN) involvement and the nodal staging given by the radiologists as well as the PLN classification given by the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) models. Correct staging or classification of PLN involvement despite size-insignificance are marked with the character ‘X’

Discussion

In this current study, we demonstrated that DTV increased while ADC, D, and f decreased in the primary tumour as the nodal status progressed from no malignant involvement to sub-centimetre and then size-significant PLN metastases. The accuracy of the IVIM classification model was comparable to radiologists in classifying PLN involvement regardless of size but it had higher accuracy compared to the non-subspecialist in the detection of sub-centimetre metastatic PLNs.

The decreasing trend in ADC observed in this study suggests that more invasive tumours are characterized by increased cellularity. This was in corroboration with the previous study by Schob et al. which found that node-positive tumours had significantly lower ADC compared to node-negative tumours [34], though a study by Xue et al. found no difference in ADC values between the two groups [35]. The discrepancy may be due to the differences in DWI acquisition, in which the former had a similar acquisition to the present study (3 T MRI with b-values 0 and 1000 s/mm2), while the latter used a lower field strength and different b-value combination (1.5 T MRI with b-values 0 and 800 s/mm2).

We also observed a decreasing trend in D, though this trend was not significant, which suggests that there are some non-negligible perfusion effects. Immunohistochemical studies have suggested that acute hypoxia from reduced tumour perfusion increased the tumour’s metastatic capacity [36, 37]. Similarly, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI studies have shown that poor perfusion was associated with an increase in the nodal metastatic capacity of the primary tumour [37, 38], which could be related to the poor tumour oxygenation [39, 40]. While it is believed that the two techniques do not measure the same perfusion phenomenon [41, 42], the study by Lee et al. found significant correlations between IVIM perfusion and DCE perfusion in cervical cancer [43]. Moreover, a previous study found that dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) percentages were lower in malignant cervical nodes compared to benign nodes which indicate restricted microcapillary perfusion [44]. This may explain why the perfusivity characteristics, rather than microarchitecture of the primary tumour, adds value in classifying the metastatic propensity in cervical cancer.

It has been shown that at least part of a PLNs has similar microarchitecture to the primary tumour [45]. We observed significant differences in ADC and f values of the primary tumour between PLN involvement groups, but not in D percentiles. Our observation partially concurred with the study by Wu et al. that found that metastatic LNs had lower f values; however, they found that PLNs had higher D values [46]. In that study, lymph nodes with small volumes were included in analysis and might affect quantification of diffusion parameters due to partial volume effects [47], potentially accounting for the discrepant result observed in our study. On the other hand, the observed ADC results concur with the other studies that attributed lower ADC in metastatic lymph nodes to tumour tissue invasion, leading to increased cellularity and enlarged cell size [48,49,50].

The IVIM classification model suggests that PLN involvement is best characterised by the tumour’s diffusion volume and perfusivity and its overall accuracy was similar to that of radiologists. When identifying patients with sub-centimetre PLN involvement, the subspecialist performed better than the non-subspecialist, likely related to the greater experience and more emphasis placed on the morphology and signal of the PLN over the size criterion. The IVIM classification model had similar accuracy as the subspecialist’s staging in identifying patients with sub-centimetre metastatic PLNs. As we did not observe any significant differences in any parameters examined between tumours with sub-centimetre involvement and those with size significant involvement, it is likely that these tumours have similar diffusion and perfusion characteristics. This suggests that parametric IVIM could serve as adjunct tool for a non-subspecialist and provide an objective quantification when staging lymph node involvement.

This study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective, single-centre study with a relatively small sample size. Second, extended scan coverage and the direct measurements of the diffusional signals of PLNs and were not performed due to the inherently longer scan time with IVIM. Though not clinically routine, previous studies have explored use of quantitative DWI to detect lymph node metastasis, which was shown to have a pooled sensitivity of 86–87% and specificity of 83–84% [12, 51]. Third, while the existence hyperplastic lymph nodes has been noted as a major source of false positives in MRI PLN assessment, we could not analyse hyperplastic lymph nodes due to the low number of false positives in our radiologists’ classifications. Lastly, only a small proportion of our patients (n = 9) had histological confirmation of the nodal status and majority (n = 41) had their nodal status determined by FDG-PET/CT. FDG-PET/CT is supported by the latest FIGO staging guidelines in nodal assessment given its high sensitivity of 83%, especially in PLN staging and low false negative rate of 4–15% in LACC [12, 52, 53].

Conclusions

IVIM analysis of the primary tumour in cervical cancer is potentially useful in determining PLN involvement and could provide more objective and quantifiable evaluation, but its added value is diminished as reader experience increases in the detection of sub-centimetre PLNs.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact the corresponding author regarding any requests for the data used or analysed in this study.

Abbreviations

ADC:

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

CI:

Confidence Interval

CCRT:

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

D:

Pure Diffusion Coefficient

DCE:

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced

DKI:

Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging

DTI:

Diffusion Tensor Imaging

DTV:

Diffusion Tumour Volume

DSC:

Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast

DWI:

Diffusion Weighted Imaging

f :

Perfusion fraction

FDG-PET/CT:

18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Combined with Computed Tomography

FIGO:

International Federation of Gynaecology and Oncology

ICC:

Intraclass Correlation Coefficient

IVIM:

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion

LACC:

Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

PLN:

Pelvic Lymph Node

PLND:

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

ROC:

Receiver Operating Characteristic

SCC:

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

T2W:

T2-Weighted

VOI:

Volumetric Region of Interest

References

  1. 1.

    Choi KH, Kim JY, Lee DS, Lee YH, Lee S-W, et al. Clinical impact of boost irradiation to pelvic lymph node in uterine cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(16):e0517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ariga T, Toita T, Kasuya G, Nagai Y, Inamine M, et al. External beam boost irradiation for clinically positive pelvic nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer. J Radiat Res. 2013;54(4):690–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gaffney DK, Erickson-Wittmann BA, Jhingran A, Mayr NA, Puthawala AA, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria; on advanced cervical Cancer expert panel on radiation oncology-gynecology. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2011;81(3):609–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Matsuo K, Machida H, Mandelbaum RS, Konishi I, Mikami M. Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;152(1):87–93.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bellomi M, Bonomo G, Landoni F, Villa G, Leon ME, et al. Accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of lymph node involvement in cervix carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(12):2469–74.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, Newcombe RG, Radcliffe AG, et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal Cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with Histopathologic comparison. Radiology. 2003;227(2):371–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Carrington BM. Diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of pelvic tumors: the role of MR imaging. In: MRI Manual of Pelvic Cancer, vol. 1; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Choi HJ, Kim SH, Seo S-S, Kang S, Lee S, et al. MRI for pretreatment lymph node staging in uterine cervical cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(5):W538–W43.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hawighorst H, Schoenberg SO, Knapstein PG, Knopp MV, Schaeffer U, et al. Staging of invasive cervical carcinoma and of pelvic lymph nodes by high resolution MRI with a phased-array coil in comparison with pathological findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22(1):75–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Braun C, Vogelgesang D, Ihling C, Högerle S, et al. Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical Cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology. 2001;218(3):776–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Choi HJ, Ju W, Myung SK, Kim Y. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis. Cancer Sci. 2010;101(6):1471–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liu B, Gao S, Li S. A comprehensive comparison of CT, MRI, positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/CT, and diffusion weighted imaging-MRI for detecting the lymph nodes metastases in patients with cervical Cancer: a meta-analysis based on 67 studies. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2017;82(3):209–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Alberts DS, Brady M, Cikaric S, Chen H, Dinshaw K, et al. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1.

  14. 14.

    Becker AS, Ghafoor S, Marcon M, Perucho JA, Wurnig MC, et al. MRI texture features may predict differentiation and nodal stage of cervical cancer: a pilot study. Acta Radiol Open. 2017;6(10):2058460117729574.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Downey K, Riches SF, Morgan VA, Giles SL, Attygalle AD, et al. Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(2):314–20.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    McVeigh PZ, Syed AM, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Haider MA. Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(5):1058–64.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Razek AAKA, Lattif MA, Denewer A, Farouk O, Nada N. Assessment of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in combination with routine and dynamic contrast MR imaging. Breast Cancer. 2016;23(3):525–32.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Abdel Razek AAK, Soliman N, Elashery R. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of mediastinal masses in children. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(6):1311–4.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kallehauge JF, Tanderup K, Haack S, Nielsen T, Muren LP, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a quantitative parameter in diffusion weighted MR imaging in gynecologic cancer: dependence on b-values used. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(7):1017–22.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lee EY, Yu X, Chu MM, Ngan HY, Siu SW, et al. Perfusion and diffusion characteristics of cervical cancer based on intraxovel incoherent motion MR imaging-a pilot study. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(7):1506–13.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;168(2):497–505.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wang M, Perucho JA, Chan Q, Sun J, Ip P, et al. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in the Assessment of Cervical Carcinoma. Acad Radiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.022.

  23. 23.

    Khalek Abdel Razek AA. Characterization of salivary gland tumours with diffusion tensor imaging. Dentomaxillofac Rad. 2018;47(5):20170343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Abdel Razek AAK. Routine and advanced diffusion imaging modules of the salivary glands. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2018;28(2):245–54.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhu L, Zhu L, Wang H, Yan J, Liu B, et al. Predicting and early monitoring treatment efficiency of cervical cancer under concurrent chemoradiotherapy by intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017;41(3):422–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lee EYP, Perucho JAU, Vardhanabhuti V, He J, Siu SWK, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI assessment of chemoradiation-induced pelvic bone marrow changes in cervical cancer and correlation with hematological toxicity. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(5):1491–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vargo JA, Kim H, Choi S, Sukumvanich P, Olawaiye AB, et al. Extended field intensity modulated radiation therapy with concomitant boost for lymph node–positive cervical cancer: analysis of regional control and recurrence patterns in the positron emission tomography/computed tomography era. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2014;90(5):1091–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Andreou A, Koh DM, Collins DJ, Blackledge M, Wallace T, et al. Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(2):428–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Le Bihan D, Iima M. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: what water tells us about biological tissues. PLoS Biol. 2015;13(7):e1002203.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Orton MR, Collins DJ, Koh DM, Leach MO. Improved intravoxel incoherent motion analysis of diffusion weighted imaging by data driven Bayesian modeling. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71(1):411–20.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tan P-N, Kumar V, Steinbach M. Introduction to data mining, 1st ed edn: Pearson Addison Wesley; 2005..

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Schob S, Meyer HJ, Pazaitis N, Schramm D, Bremicker K, et al. ADC histogram analysis of cervical Cancer aids detecting lymphatic metastases—a preliminary study. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017;19(6):1–10.

  35. 35.

    Xue H, Ren C, Yang J, Sun Z, Li S, et al. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for the assessment of local aggressiveness of cervical cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(2):341–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Cairns RA, Hill RP. Acute hypoxia enhances spontaneous lymph node metastasis in an Orthotopic murine model of human cervical carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2004;64(6):2054–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rofstad EK, Gaustad J-V, Egeland TAM, Mathiesen B, Galappathi K. Tumors exposed to acute cyclic hypoxic stress show enhanced angiogenesis, perfusion and metastatic dissemination. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(7):1535–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Weikel W, Knopp MV, Zuna I, et al. Angiogenesis of uterine cervical carcinoma: characterization by pharmacokinetic magnetic resonance parameters and histological microvessel density with correlation to lymphatic involvement. Cancer Res. 1997;57(21):4777–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sundfør K, Lyng H, Rofstad EK. Oxygen tension and vascular density in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Oncol. 1998;37(7–8):665–70.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fyles A, Milosevic M, Hedley D, Pintilie M, Levin W, et al. Tumor hypoxia has independent predictor impact only in patients with node-negative cervix cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(3):680–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Le Bihan D. Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR imaging: a wake-up call. Radiology. 2008;249(3):748–52.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sakamoto J, Imaizumi A, Sasaki Y, Kamio T, Wakoh M, et al. Comparison of accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion and apparent diffusion coefficient techniques for predicting malignancy of head and neck tumors using half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;32(7):860–6.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lee EY, Hui ES, Chan KK, Tse KY, Kwong WK, et al. Relationship between intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tissue perfusion of cervical cancers. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42(2):454–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Razek AAKA, Gaballa G. Role of perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011;35(1):21–5.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lin G, Ho KC, Wang JJ, Ng KK, Wai YY, et al. Detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and uterine cancers by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28(1):128–35.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wu Q, Zheng D, Shi L, Liu M, Wang M, et al. Differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer patients using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(12):5272–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Winfield JM, Payne GS, Weller A, NM dS. DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and MRS in Cancer: challenges and advantages of implementing qualitative and quantitative multi-parametric imaging in the clinic. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;25(5):245–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Choi EK, Kim JK, Choi HJ, Park SH, Park B-W, et al. Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(8):2024–32.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Liu Y, Liu H, Bai X, Ye Z, Sun H, et al. Differentiation of metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(1):19–24.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kim JK, Kim KA, Park BW, Kim N, Cho KS. Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: early experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28(3):714–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Shen G, Zhou H, Jia Z, Deng H. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of pelvic metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brit J Radiol. 2015;88(1052):20150063.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143(S2):22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, Myers ER. FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97(1):183–91.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was partially supported by the General Research Fund (GRF, No. 17119916) of the Research Grants Council (RGC), Hong Kong.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JP analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. KC segmented and calculated tumour volumes of DW-MRI and served as the non-subspecialist in MRI nodal staging. PK and EW provided expert advice in the use of PET/CT for nodal staging. KT and MC assisted in patient recruitment. LC and HP aided in the statistical analysis. EL obtained ethics approval for the study, segmented and calculated tumour volumes on DW-MRI, served as the subspecialist in MRI nodal staging, revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elaine Yuen Phin Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained from Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (HKU/HA HKWC IRB), IRB Reference Number UW 16–325. The study is a retrospective study involving human data that has already been collected and did not require additional recruitment of human subjects, waiving the need for informed consent and done in accordance with the regulations set by the IRB.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perucho, J.A.U., Chiu, K.W.H., Wong, E.M.F. et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of primary cervical cancer in the detection of sub-centimetre metastatic lymph nodes. Cancer Imaging 20, 27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00303-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cervical Cancer
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Diffusion-weighted imaging
  • Intravoxel incoherent motion
  • Perfusion
  • Lymph node metastasis