- Open Access
Cross-sectional imaging in cancers of the head and neck: how we review and report
© The Author(s). 2016
- Received: 9 March 2016
- Accepted: 20 June 2016
- Published: 3 August 2016
Cancer of the head and neck is the sixth most frequent cancer worldwide and associated with significant morbidity. The head and neck area is complex and divided into various anatomical and functional subunits. Imaging is performed by cross-sectional modalities like computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound and positron emission tomography-computed tomography, usually with fluorine-18-deoxy-D-glucose. Therefore, knowledge of the cross-sectional anatomy is very important. This article seeks to give an overview of the various cross-sectional imaging modalities used in the evaluation of head and neck cancers. It briefly describes the anatomy of the extracranial head and neck and the role of imaging as well as the imaging appearance of tumours and their extension to lymph nodes, bone and surrounding tissue. The advantages and disadvantages as well as basic requirements of the various modalities are described along with ways of optimizing imaging quality. A general guideline for prescription of the various modalities is given. Pitfalls are many and varied and can be due to anatomical variation, due to pathology which can be misinterpreted and technical due to peculiarities of the various imaging modalities. Knowledge of these pitfalls can help to avoid misinterpretation. The important points to be mentioned while reporting are also enumerated.
- Vocal Cord
- Extracapsular Spread
- Retropharyngeal Space
- Perineural Spread
- Degrade Image Quality
Cancer of the head and neck, excluding cancer of the skin and lymphoma is the sixth most frequent cancer worldwide with a current estimation of incidence being about 600,000 per year and deaths resulting in about 300,000 per year . The reported incidence rate in 2008 was 6.8 % . There is a geographical variation in the distribution of different head and neck cancers due to differences in genetic susceptibility, cultural risk factors like smoking, drinking, betel nut chewing, prevalence of nutritional deficiencies, difference in diet, socioeconomic status and presence of infectious agents, particularly the human papillomavirus (HPV particularly type 16), the Epstein Barr virus and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Certain tumours also show a gender difference with squamous cell cancers being more common in males and thyroid tumours more common in females [1–3]. Radiation exposure is an established risk for development of thyroid cancer and for mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands [2, 4].
There have been reported associations with environmental toxins like formaldehyde .
Patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer can have synchronous and metachronous primary cancer of the upper aerodigestive (AE) tract. They are also at risk of developing lung cancer, oesophageal and gastric cancer usually due to combined smoking and alcohol consumption. The annual incidence of second primary cancer following successful therapy of a tumour has been reported as 3-7 % .
The anatomy of the head and neck is very complex and knowledge of anatomy is imperative for head and neck radiologists in order to accurately localise the disease process and its relationship to adjacent structures and to make the correct diagnosis. On cross-sectional imaging, the extracranial head and neck can be divided into various anatomical spaces by fascial planes, each space having different contents and different pathologies.
The infrahyoid neck spaces consist of the visceral space including the trachea, esophagus, thyroid and parathyroid glands, the carotid space, the retropharyngeal space and the perivertebral space which extend downwards from the suprahyoid neck (Fig. 1b).
The carotid, perivertebral and retropharyngeal spaces are long vertical spaces extending from the skull base into the chest. The retropharyngeal space is a potential space bounded anteriorly by the visceral fascia and posteriorly by the prevertebral fascia and extends from the base of the skull to the posterior mediastinum till about the level of the carina. The perivertebral space includes the longus colli muscles, the paraspinal muscles, vertebrae, vertebral artery and vein and the spinal cord.
Deep spaces of the neck with contents and tumours which can arise
Pharyngeal mucosa space
Mucosa with minor salivary glands
Levator and constrictor muscles
Cartilaginous eustachian tube
Squamous cell carcinoma of pharynx
Minor salivary gland tumours, lymphoma
Minor salivary glands
Trigeminal nerve (V3)
Internal maxillary / ascending pharyngeal artery
Minor salivary gland tumours
Soft tissue sarcoma
Metastatic lymph nodes
Muscles of mastication
Mandibular ramus and body
Inferior alveolar nerve
Sarcoma of muscle or bone, metastases
Lymphomas, direct spread of carcinoma, Minor salivary tumour,
Intraparotid lymph nodes
Facial nerve (VII)
External carotid artery / retromandibular vein
Salivary gland tumours like mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic cancer etc.
Oncocytomas, schwannomas, lipomas
Cranial nerves IX-XII
Jugular chain nodes
Carotid artery / jugular vein
Ectopic salivary gland tissue
Metastatic lymphadenopathy, lymphomas
Salivary gland tumours
Primary and secondary bone tumours
Metastatic lymph nodes
Visceral space (infrahyoid neck)
Nerves and vessels
Squamous cell carcinomas
Minor salivary gland tumours
Thyroid gland tumours
Furthermore, the head and neck area is divided into several anatomical and functional units, with each having a different pattern of tumour spread and T staging (Fig. 2).
The nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses (PNS)
The oral cavity and lips, the buccal mucosa, the upper and lower alveolar ridges, retromolar gingiva, floor of the mouth, hard palate and the tongue anterior to the circumvallate papillae
The oropharynx consisting of the soft palate including uvula, tonsils, base of the tongue and pharyngeal walls
The hypopharynx or laryngopharynx consisting of the pyriform sinus, postcricoid area and posterior hypopharyngeal wall
The larynx which is divided into the supraglottic portion (suprahyoid epiglottis with both lingual and laryngeal surfaces, aryepiglottic folds, arytenoid cartilages, the false vocal cords and the ventricles), the glottis (true vocal cords and the anterior and posterior commissures) and the subglottis which starts below the true vocal cords to the inferior margin of the cricoid
The major and minor salivary glands
- (8)The thyroid gland
Tumours can be benign or malignant and can arise from the skin, the mucosa, the major and minor salivary glands, the thyroid, the lymph nodes, the mesenchymal tissues including the bone, cartilage, fibrous tissue, fat, muscles and nerves. They can arise locally or be part of a systemic malignancy. 90 % of head and neck neoplasms consist of epithelial malignancies of the mucosal membranes of the upper AE tract called head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). The second group consists of glandular tumours arising in the major and minor salivary glands and in the thyroid gland. Skin cancer and non-melanoma skin cancer of the head and neck are considered a separate group. Other less frequent tumours include localised lymphoma, sarcomas of bone and soft tissues, and neuroectodermal tumours like paraganglioma, olfactory neuroblastoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma and malignant melanoma . Very superficial lesions of the mucosa are easily seen clinically, but may not always be identified on cross-sectional imaging due to their small volume.
Treatment options include surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Treatment varies according to the type of tumours and their site of origin. We mainly need to detect and localise the tumour and define the extent of spread, the final diagnosis is then made by the pathologist.
The cross-sectional imaging modalities available include computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography with fluorine-18-deoxy-D-glucose (18FDG PET-CT). Each modality has its own strengths and weaknesses; these are enumerated below.
This is easily available, entails no radiation, is portable, cheap, has a high resolution and assessment of blood vessels and tumour vascularity can be performed in real time without giving contrast media. Intravascular contrast media (SonoVueR) can be given to evaluate enhancement of lesions. Ultrasound is ideal for guiding interventions where the lesion is well visualised.
The disadvantages of ultrasound include operator dependency and the fact that sound waves are not transmitted through bone and air, resulting in nonvisualisation of structures behind bones and air collections. Very large lesions can be difficult to evaluate completely and multiple lesions require conscientious documentation.
This is usually the first modality used because it is widely available, relatively cheap, quick and easy to perform and reproducible. The examination time is short with less motion artefacts than an MR scan. Thin slice, high resolution image acquisition allows high quality multiplanar reconstructions with superior evaluation of bony structures and calcifications. The study can be easily extended to the rest of the body for staging purposes. Evaluation of CT images is also easier than evaluation of MR images.
Disadvantages of CT include radiation exposure, poorer soft tissue contrast compared to MRI, the need to inject iodinated contrast medium to improve contrast with the risk of contrast induced nephropathy and artefacts due to dental amalgam or orthopaedic material, if present. Contraindications to CT can be absolute or relative and include allergy to contrast media, kidney failure with some remaining function, hyperthyroidism, thyroid cancer, bodyweight above 200 kg and inability to lie down. Children are preferentially scanned with MRI or ultrasound when feasible to avoid radiation exposure.
This has many advantages: good soft tissue contrast, multiplanar scanning, evaluation of blood vessels without giving contrast media, no radiation exposure, no iodine containing contrast needs to be given. Functional imaging like diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion and dynamic enhancement studies can be performed.
The main disadvantages include higher costs and longer acquisition time. The investigation is more complex with many possible sequences which can be performed and evaluation of the images is also more demanding. There are a multitude of potential artefacts (motion artefacts, flow artefacts, field distortion artefacts due to metal or at air bone interfaces or with blood products) which can mimic or obscure pathology. The face, neck and base of the skull have multiple soft tissue, air and bone interfaces with increased chance of susceptibility artefacts. Additionally movement and swallowing artefacts can degrade image quality. Examination of larger body areas is limited by longer duration of image acquisition. Gadolinium containing contrast agents should be given to evaluate tumours and abscesses. Contraindications to the use of gadolinium are absolute or relative and include previous or pre-existing nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), previous anaphylactic reaction to gadolinium containing contrast agents, patients with a glomerular filtration rate below 30 ml/min/1,73 m2, unstable renal impairment, hepatorenal syndrome or chronic liver function disorders and pregnancy. The risk-benefit of giving Gadolinium has to be discussed with the referring physician. Since macrocyclic compounds of gadolinium are known to be more stable than linear compounds of gadolinium, they should be preferably given if absolutely necessary.
There are also absolute and relative contraindications to performing MRI. A body weight over 200 kg precludes an MRI as the table cannot carry this weight. Other contraindications include ferromagnetic metal fragments near vital structures, metal implants in the area of interest, older pacemakers, nerve stimulators, pumps, cochlear implants and stapes prostheses, claustrophobia, very ill patients, patients who cannot lie down for long periods of time due to pain or increased risks of aspiration.
The advantages include evaluation of the whole body including the area of interest, lymph node involvement, detection and exclusion of distant metastases and the high sensitivity of detection of glucose uptake. One big disadvantage is that it is nonspecific as uptake is also increased in inflammation. It is also more expensive, time consuming, requires patient to be fasting for 6 h, the scanning time is 20–30 min and the total investigation time is about 2–3 h. There is some radiation exposure which varies depending on whether a low dose CT is done for attenuation correction or a diagnostic quality CT is performed. Interpretation can be difficult in areas of complex anatomy, physiological variants and unusual patterns of high FDG- uptake in the head and neck.
PET image evaluation is mainly performed by qualitative visual assessment. Visual assessment requires definition of a threshold for judgement of existence and degree of radiotracer concentration. A semi-quantitative parameter currently used for PET is the standardised uptake value, which is defined as the tissue concentration of tracer within a lesion divided by tissue density, as measured by PET, divided by the injected dose normalised to patient weight multiplied by a decay factor. Instead of body weight, the injected dose may also be corrected by the lean body mass, or body surface area (BSA). Different tumours also show different glucose uptake and there is no standard threshold value for diagnosis of tumours, however it can be useful for therapy monitoring.
Clinical examination and endoscopy can visualise tumours in the mucosa of the upper AE tract. However, not all areas are well visualised and submucosal and deeper tumours cannot be seen.
The role of imaging lies in the detection or exclusion of tumours, the characterisation of tumours if present and also to delineate it’s size and extent, to see which structures are involved, whether there is spread to regional lymph nodes, perineural or perivascular spread, bony invasion or in staging examinations, to detect metastases.
Imaging is also used for obtaining tissue diagnosis by image guided biopsies, for planning therapy (radiotherapy, computer assisted surgery), to follow patients under therapy if necessary, to evaluate response to treatment allowing change in therapy when possible and after treatment, to detect recurrences before it becomes clinically evident to improve chances of successful salvage.
CT and MRI are commonly used and provide most of the relevant information when the study parameters are optimised. Information provided by the different modalities are usually complementary. The choice of the primary imaging modality depends on what the clinician wants to know, the available technology, cost factors, reimbursement policies, clinician acceptance and patient factors like presence of contraindications to MRI (older pacemakers, metal fragments, aneurysmal clips) or contraindications to the use of iodinated contrast media (allergy, renal failure, thyroid cancer). For paediatric patients, radiation exposure is an important factor to consider and therefore MRI should be performed in children-if available.
The ideal initial study is one which is safe and provides all the information required for proper management. This depends on the site of origin of the tumour and known patterns of spread. The next study, if required should be able to answer questions not clarified by the first study.
Furthermore, distant metastases or concomitant tumours which can be present due to common risk factors should be excluded. This is usually done either by performing a whole body CT or PET-CT. There are increasing reports of PET-MRI, but the availability is limited.
Once the presence of a tumour is established, one has to correctly localise the tumour and identify its extent.
On PET-CT, the morphological changes due to the tumour are seen as in CT with increased uptake of glucose in those tumours which are FDG avid (Figs. 4c, 5f), other processes resulting in glucose uptake like inflammation or biopsy will however also show increased uptake and should be excluded when possible.
Bony erosion appears as an interruption of the hypointense cortical rim on MR (Fig. 5a-c) or the peripheral, cortical hyperattenuating rim on CT (Fig. 5d,e). Detection of subtle erosions require thin section CT with bone algorithm reconstruction in multiple planes. Sclerosis can be a sign of tumour infiltration or reactive osteitis. Medullary involvement is better detected with MRI. The replacement of normal hyperintense fat signal in the bone marrow on native T1-weighting with enhancing tissue indicate marrow involvement. Unfortunately, these changes can also be seen in peritumoral edema, inflammation, coexisting periodontal diseases, osteomyelitis, radiation fibrosis and osteoradionecrosis.
PET-CT signs of nerve involvement include linear thickening or linear increased/decreased FDG activity along the expected course of the cranial nerve. Abnormal activity can be seen in the muscles supplied by the nerve or increased FDG activity in the synergistic/antagnostic muscles which overcompensate to maintain function where possible. Other signs like atrophy and foramen changes are seen on the CT images .
Metastases to adjacent Iymph nodes is an important prognostic factor. We use an image based classification of cervical Iymph nodes described by Som et al. , where lymph nodes are divided into seven stations in the neck according to their position. The retropharyngeal, occipital, facial, parotid and mastoid lymph nodes are not included in this classification and when involved are named according to their anatomical site. Most metastatic nodes are enlarged, a transversal short axis diameter of more than 1.5 cm for Level II nodes, and more than 1 cm for all other nodes in the neck are considered pathological (Fig. 4b). However, normal sized nodes can have focal areas of necrosis indicating metastases (Fig. 3b). This should be differentiated from the fatty hilus by carefully looking at the native scans and measuring the Hounsfield units, necrosis also tends to be central while the hilus is eccentric . Other features include increased enhancement, irregularity in shape, heterogeneous enhancement and stranding or obvious infiltration of the adjacent soft tissue which imply extracapsular spread. Extracapsular spread is an important finding to be mentioned in the report since it is a marker of increased locoregional failure if only surgery is performed and chemoradiation should also be given.
Tumours are classified into stages which determine the appropriate treatment and prognosis. The union for international cancer control (UICC) has published a staging system UICC TNM classification that is internationally accepted. It is based on the primary tumour site characteristics like size and spread (T), involvement of Iymph nodes (N) and the presence or absence of metastases (M). The use of this standard staging helps in treatment planning, in follow up and allows exchange of information between treatment centres. The anatomically based TNM classification considers the local, regional and distant extension of tumours. Due to the numerous subsites in the head and neck, each with different T staging, readers are referred to the UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours .
N staging for most tumours (except the nasopharynx and thyroid)
Nx means that the regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0 no node involvement
N1 single ipsilateral lymph node 3 cm or less in greatest diameter
N2a single ipsilateral lymph node between 3 and 6 cm
N2b multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes less than 6 cm
N2c contralateral or bilateral lymph nodes less than 6 cm
N3 any lymph node larger than 6 cm.
N staging of nasopharyngeal tumours (midline nodes are considered ipsilateral).
N0 no node involvement
N1 ipsilateral single lymph node above the supraclavicular fossa, and/or unilateral or bilateral retropharyngeal lymph node(s), 3 cm or less in greatest dimension
N2a ipsilateral single lymph node between 3 to 6 cm
N2b multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes less than 6 cm
N2c contralateral or bilateral lymph node(s) 6 cm in greatest diameter above the supraclavicular fossa
N3a lymph node or nodes larger than 6 cm, unilateral or bilateral
N3b extension to the supraclavicular fossa
N staging for thyroid cancer
N1a level VI (pretracheal, paratracheal, prelaryngeal /Delphian lymph nodes)
N1b unilateral, bilateral or contralateral cervical (level I-V), retropharyngeal or superior mediastinal (level VII) nodes.
The presence of metastases is another important prognostic factor. M0 means there is no distant metastasis and M1 indicates spread to distant organs beyond the regional nodes.
Therapy depends on the tumour type and staging and consists of surgery and/or chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Therefore, the correct diagnosis and adequate assessment of tumour extent is essential for proper therapy of the tumours.
Patients with complications after treatment may present for imaging. Early surgical complications like fistula formation can be diagnosed on fluoroscopy or on CT after giving oral contrast media. Late complications of radiotherapy like osteonecrosis and soft tissue necrosis can be seen well on both CT and MRI scans although it can sometimes be difficult to differentiate from tumour recurrences or infections. Radionecrosis occurs after radiotherapy, the presence of air, sclerosis and fragmentation of the bone points to radionecrosis.
The modality prescribed depends primarily on availability. In developed countries most modalities are available and physician’s preference, experience, expertise, the area of interest and the information required determines what is prescribed. As a general guide, MRI is best for evaluation of the oral cavity and oropharynx and for evaluation of perineural tumour spread. For evaluation of the PNS, nasal cavity and larynx, where soft tissue and bony details are important, both CT and MRI are commonly used and provide complementary information. The thyroid gland is well evaluated by ultrasound, MRI or CT, the use of iodinated contrast media is contraindicated in cases of suspected thyroid cancer due to therapeutic implications. The salivary glands can be evaluated by all cross-sectional modalities. For evaluation of the lymph node status, all modalities can be used. MRI is preferred for evaluation of perineural spread.
Ultrasound is used widely for evaluation of the thyroid gland, neck lymph nodes and salivary glands and in soft tissue mass evaluation and in the paediatric population. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology or biopsies can be highly accurate for neck node staging but is highly operator dependent. Also not all areas of the neck can be adequately visualised by ultrasound (e.g., deep lobe of the parotid, retropharangeal lymph nodes) and a CT or MRI may be required for completion of staging.
PET-CT is useful for detection of the primary tumour, known or unknown, nodal metastases, second tumours or distant metastases. It has a role in restaging and long term surveillance to detect recurrence.
In our institute, patients with clinically known tumours undergo a CT scan of the neck as the primary investigation. A complementary MRI is done when possible for better tumour delineation in patients with tumours of the oropharynx, oral cavity, nasopharynx, PNS and for exclusion of perineural tumour spread. Conventional CT of the thorax and abdomen is done for staging of early tumours T1-2 N0. PET-CT is performed for advanced tumours T3-4 where there is increased risk of metastases, in all patients with lymph node metastases and for cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Most patients also undergo panendoscopy and all patients are biopsied. Ultrasound is usually reserved for evaluation of the thyroid glands and for guiding biopsies in adults. Children presenting with a swelling are preferentially evaluated first with ultrasound and then as required, with MRI, in order to avoid radiation exposure.
After completion of therapy, patients are assessed clinically and radiologically to detect tumour persistence / recurrence or metastases. The radiological follow up after therapy is individualised and depends on tumour type and tumour stage, but the general scheme applied in our institute is a CT or MRI scan 3–4 months after completion of therapy, which is repeated after about 1 year and 2 years. Patients with stage III and IV cancers undergo restaging with PET-CT at 4–5 months after end of therapy.
The lesion should be accessible to ultrasound without any intervening bone or air.
Proper patient positioning with good access to the structure to be evaluated is important. One should use adequate gel and the correct frequency of the transducer. The higher the frequency of the transducer the better the resolution but the penetration into the deeper tissues is restricted and for scanning deeper tissues, the frequency has to be reduced. We use multifrequency transducers where the frequency is adjusted during the scanning. It is important to know the limitations of ultrasound and to advise either a CT or MRI when required.
State of the art CT requires multidetector CT. Volumetric data are acquired rapidly, reducing volume averaging artefacts and motion artefacts and allowing high quality retrospective reformations. One disadvantage is the higher radiation dose. Since CT has poor soft tissue contrast, intravenous iodine containing contrast agents have to be injected. Delay between injection and scanning is essential to allow time for the contrast to reach the area of interest.
Proper positioning of patient supine with neck in slight extension is important. The head should be positioned as symmetrically as possible, the patient should be as comfortable as possible to avoid movement. Dental amalgam can seriously degrade image quality and in patients with tumours of the oral cavity, scanning can be done with a tilted CT gantry or with an open mouth. The puffed air technique which entails puffing the cheeks out with air during scanning improves delineation of oral mucosal lesions and allows identification of site of origin of tumours. Using a modified Valsalva maneuver, which consists of expiration against the resistance of pursed lips or a pursed nose and holding the breath for at least 10 s during scanning, dilatation of the hypopharynx and its visualisation can be improved. E phonation, which is performed by having the patient say ‘e’ uniformly for at least 10 s during scanning, also results in better depiction of the true and false vocal cords and the laryngeal ventricles with better localisation of site of origin of tumours.
Scanning factors can be optimised. The field of view (FOV) should be as small as possible to optimise spatial resolution. Image reconstructions are done using soft tissue windows and bone windows. Lung windows should be used to evaluate the apical lungs which are also included in the lower neck scans to exclude metastases. Volumetric scanning allows reconstruction of the images in the correct plane, for example for larynx cancers along the plane of the vocal cord. Three dimensional reformatting is usually used for evaluation of bony structures. 3D volume rendering and virtual endoscopy can also be performed.
From skull base to the oral cavity, image plane should be parallel to the hard palate, from the oral cavity to the thoracic inlet, image plane should be parallel to the vocal cords which is practically parallel to the intervertebral disc space at C 4–5 and C 5–6 level.
A 1.5 or 3 Tesla MRI scanner is required. For lesions near the skull base, a head coil is used and for lesions lower in the neck, a neck coil can be used. The use of a single receiver prevents evaluation of the Iymph nodes status. The combination of a head and a neck coil permits evaluation of the whole head and neck area. Disadvantage of combination of coils is the change in the recipient field characteristics at the crossover between two coils. Meticulous shimming, coil and patient positioning as well as the use of sequences with short echo trains can help overcome this drawback .
The patient should be supine, the head and neck should be aligned and symmetrically positioned. The patient should be positioned comfortably with slight head fixation to reduce motion artefacts. The patient should not cough during image acquisition. Patient should be encouraged not to speak or swallow during image acquisition even though it may not always be feasible. Sedation of children can reduce movement.
Sequences: The standard sequences used in our institute include, a coronal inversion recovery sequence, axial T1-weighted and T2-weighted images over the area of interest, DW-MRI with three b values (50, 300, 800), post contrast T1-weighted axial images and a volumetric interpolated brain examination (VIBE) with fat saturation over the whole neck. For evaluation of the larynx and hypopharynx, 3 mm slice thickness is mandatory. Otherwise 3–4 mm axial slice thickness is used. The 3D VIBE is very good for evaluation of perineural spread. In the presence of metal, fat saturation should not be performed. Perfusion and dynamic scanning are not performed routinely.
Technical parameters can be optimised. The use of faster pulse sequences and parallel imaging if coils permit, echo train length for diffusion can shorten the scan time, thus improving image quality. CT is however much quicker and to be preferred in very sick and restless patients.
Injecting MR contrast is important as it increases the contrast between tumour and surrounding lesions improving tumour detection, necrosis is also seen better after contrast administration. Bone involvement detection requires fat saturation after contrast as the signal intensity after contrast becomes similar to the fat in the bone marrow.
DW-MRI should be performed routinely. Factors for optimisation of diffusion-weighted images include minimisation of echo train length for SE echoplanar sequences, the use of shim blocks, zoom echo-planar imaging, use of antisusceptibility cushion and parallel imaging .
For evaluation of the head and neck, it is necessary to perform dedicated high resolution head and neck CT (HR HN PET-CT) with smaller FOV, longer acquisition time per slice position and thinner slice thickness. This is performed ideally with the arms lying parallel to the body and includes giving intravenous contrast. Ideally smaller pixels should be used, reducing partial volume effect which underestimates FDG activity in all lesions smaller than twice the spatial resolution. The use of the whole body PET-CT for evaluation of head and neck cancer is not adequate for smaller tumours.
Adequate patient preparation: patient fasting at least 6 h prior to investigation, adequate hydration, patient instructed not to chew or speak during the FDG uptake phase. Patient should be kept adequately warm for 30–60 min prior to scanning to avoid shivering and increased uptake by the muscles. All metal that can cause artefacts are removed. Proper patient positioning is important.
PET-CT in diabetics can be problematic due to elevated glucose levels with competitive inhibition of FDG in different tissues. Intravenous insulin before FDG injection can reduce glycaemia but it increases FDG uptake in muscles and fat. Monitoring serial blood sugar levels (BSL) after giving insulin and only giving FDG when the BSL is starting to rise or plateauing, minimises the muscular uptake due to insulin. Another option is to reschedule the investigation if BSL are more than 120 mg/dl.
Pitfalls can be due to variations in the anatomy, pathology which can be misinterpreted, technical factors/changes obscuring or mimicking disease. Incidental findings may be insignificant or significant and can alter patient management.
Pitfalls due to normal anatomy
Hypertrophy of the lingual tonsils can look like tumour.
The arch of the thoracic duct in the left lower neck, Iying between the carotid and subclavian artery can mimic a lymph node on axial images. It is a tubular structure ending in a vein and can be identified by following it.
The accessory levator claviculae muscle, normal in lower mammals, is infrequently found in humans. It arises from the transverse process of the upper vertebrae and inserts on the lateral half of the clavicle. It can mimic nodes on axial scans.
The thyroid cartilage has a very variable pattern of ossification and areas of non-ossification can be misinterpreted as invasion of the cartilage.
Pitfalls due to pathology
Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy leads to asymmetry of the vocal cords which can be misinterpreted as a tumour.
Inflammation of the nerves like neuritis is difficult to differentiate from perineural tumour spread, clinical correlation and serial scanning is required to resolve this.
It can be difficult to differentiate between lateral neck cysts and cystic Iymph node metastases from papillary cell cancer of the thyroid. It is also difficult to differentiate between suppurative inflammatory and necrotic metastatic Iymph nodes. The margins of the nodes can be irregular and ill-defined indicating the presence of inflammation and clinical signs of inflammation are usually present. In those cases where the clinical features are equivocal, DW-MRI might help but aspiration cytology is usually required.
Tumor recurrence and therapeutic changes can also be difficult to differentiate, DW-MRI imaging and serial scanning can help, followed by biopsy when indicated.
Bony changes due to tumour infiltration / inflammation / radionecrosis can be difficult to differentiate, here the clinical setting is important and DW-MRI might also help.
Technical pitfalls with CT and MRI
Inadequate scan volume where the tumour may not be adequately included, inadequate contrast enhancement which might allow misinterpretation of blood vessels as Iymph nodes or too much contrast with beam hardening artefacts obscuring the tumour. Movement artefacts can obscure tumour. Pulsation artefacts and aliasing artefacts can mimic tumours. T2 shine through effect in DW-MRI can be mistaken for diffusion impediment if the ADC maps are not looked at.
Technical pitfalls with PET-CT
There is physiological uptake by the brain, lymphoid tissue, salivary glands, muscles and brown adipose fat when present and this should not be misinterpreted as tumour. False positive readings can occur after trauma, biopsy, chemotherapy, inflammation. Increased uptake is also seen in thyroid nodules with high glucose metabolism, Warthin tumour of the parotid gland and unilateral cranial nerve palsy. Unilateral cranial nerve palsy results in compensatory hypertrophy of the muscles on the contralateral side leading to asymmetrical increased uptake of glucose on the normal side. Patients who talk or chew after FDG injection show physiological uptake in the tongue, pterygoid muscles and vocal cords.
False negative readings can occur if the patient is not fasting (inadequate preparation), diabetes with high blood sugar level or in the vicinity of structures with high glucose metabolism, due to obscuration by dental hardware, inadequate PET scanner resolution. Well differentiated, slow growing tumours or tumours with central necrosis may not show any uptake. Very small lesions with partial volume effect can be missed and in the presence of increased background noise due to volume overload or kidney failure, lesions can be missed.
Artefacts due to dental hardware and metallic implants propagate to the PET images through CT-based attenuation correction factors .
These can be relevant or irrelevant. Relevant findings should be mentioned.
Retropharyngeal carotid artery when present should be mentioned to avoid inadvertent biopsy. Presence or absence of bony septae around the skull base in cases of computer assisted surgery in the nasal and paranasal sinuses is very important and should be mentioned.
Laryngoceles are benign but can be due to obstruction at the ventricle due to stenosis or tumour and tumour has to be excluded.
Other incidental findings like detection of other tumours or findings of systemic or local illnesses, vascular anomalies or vessel stenosis which can influence the ability of the patient to undergo surgery or radio/chemotherapy can change patient management and should be communicated to the clinician.
Irrelevant incidental findings like atheromas can be mentioned in the findings section of the report but not in the conclusion.
This is important especially in referral centers where the patients are referred with completed imaging scans. The quality of the investigations vary greatly between different institutions and if inadequate, they should be repeated. One should check whether the area of interest and the tumour has been completely included in the scan. The presence of artefacts, due to motion, metal or contrast media can seriously degrade image quality. For MRI check which sequences have been performed, whether the fat saturation is homogenous. For PET-CT look for undesired nucleotide deposition in the muscles, resolution and misregistration between the CT and the PET scan.
It is important to identify the information that the clinician requires and this should be addressed in the conclusion. A mention of the technical parameters like the different phases of contrast enhancement in CT scans and the different MR sequences performed should be made as well as a description of the body part that has been scanned. Furthermore, the name and the dose of the administered contrast medium has to be noted. We do not use report templates or include key images in our reports. Most oncologist and ENT surgeons appreciate a summary statement stating that the findings are compatible with a certain TNM stage and it should be mentioned when possible. The TNM staging of larynx cancers includes vocal cord fixation, a clinical parameter for staging and the final staging is done in the interdisciplinary tumour boards where the images and the patients are clinically evaluated at the same time. The report should include a detailed description of the tumour, its size, location, extension over the midline to the other side, the extent of local spread to bone, adjacent soft tissues, involvement of the blood vessels, whether the vessels are surrounded, invaded or only in contact. The involvement of Iymph nodes, whether unilateral or bilateral, the number of involved nodes, the location or level of the involved lymph nodes according to Som  and presence of extracapsular spread should be mentioned. Perineural spread, metastases to bone, brain or presence of other tumours are important. Invasion of adjacent muscles, the prevertebral muscles and for tumours of the tongue, involvement of extrinsic muscles increases the T staging.
Adequacy of the investigation and whether complementary imaging is required should be mentioned in the initial scan.
Important points to be included in the early posttherapeutic scan are the presence or absence of residual tumour, size if present and the degree of confidence for the diagnosis. In follow up scans, the presence or absence of recurrence or complications of treatment like osteoradionecrosis, ulcer, soft tissue necrosis and XII nerve palsy should be mentioned. DW-MRI sequences can help in differentiation between tumour and posttreatment changes. If the findings are equivocal, then depending on the clinical situation, patients should undergo a follow up examination or a biopsy.
Similarly for PET-CT, one should mention whether the investigation is of adequate quality.
Describe the location, extent and intensity of the pathological FDG accumulation. Describe all findings in the accompanying CT even if there is no accompanying increased glucose uptake. Mention confounding factors like inflammatory changes, muscle activity or high glucose levels at the time of the investigation. Address the clinical question asked. Compare with old investigations when available. A definite diagnosis should be made if possible, if findings are equivocal then the probability of a diagnosis should be stated.
In cases of conflicting findings between CT, MRI and PET-CT concerning lymph node metastases or bone and cartilage invasion, the positive findings should be used for staging as false negatives can occur. For lymph nodes, the known pattern of spread can additionally be used to determine the probability of metastatic involvement. False positive results can also occur regarding bone and cartilage involvement and discussion with the clinicians is very important. Communication of indeterminate findings is especially important before surgery so that the surgeon can plan for all eventualities preoperatively. All cases of head and neck cancers are always discussed in the interdisciplinary tumour conferences with the surgeons, the oncologists and the radiation therapists and treatment options are tailored to individual patients and also depend on the patient’s age, health status and personal wishes.
The head and neck area is complex and knowledge of anatomy is essential.
The different cross-sectional images have their strengths and weaknesses.
The diagnosis is only as good as the images available. Is the study adequate? If not repeat.
Is there a mass? Is it discrete, localised or generalised? Is it confined to an anatomical space? Proper localisation of the lesion helps in reaching the correct diagnosis. Is it multi-spatial or trans-spatial? What are the normal contents of the involved space? What are the imaging appearances and enhancement characteristics? Cystic or solid? Inflammatory or infection? Malignant?
The next step? Further imaging? Which imaging modality ? Biopsy.
There are many pitfalls and one should be aware of them.
Incidental findings although seemingly irrelevant can be a clue to an underlying tumour.
We acknowledge the excellent cooperation with our clinical colleagues with special thanks to PD Dr. Roland Giger and Dr. Simon Mueller from the Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- IARC. Head and neck cancers. In: Boyle P, Levin B, editors. World cancer report. Cancer site by site. 337: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2008. p. 331.Google Scholar
- Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOSCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vander Poorten V. Introduction: Epidemiology, risk factors, pathology, and natural history of head and neck neoplasms. In: Hermans R, editor. Head and neck cancer imaging. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 1–17.Google Scholar
- Saku T, Hayashi Y, Takahara O, Matsuura H, Tokunaga M, Tokuoka S, et al. Salivary gland tumors among atomic bomb survivors, 1950–1987. Cancer. 1997;79:1465–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vaughan TL, Stewart PA, Teschke K, Lynch CF, Swanson GM, Lyon JL, et al. Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and wood dust and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. BMJ Global health, Occup Environ Med. 2000;57:376–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raslan OA, Razi M, Shetty V, Osman MM. Image findings of cranial nerve pathology on [18 F]-2-deoxy-D-Glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography with computerized tomography (PET/CT): a pictoral essay. Cancer Imaging. 2015;15:20. doi:10.1186/s40644-015-0054-0.
- Som PM, Curtin HD, Mancuso AA. Imaging-based nodal classification for evaluation of neck metastatic adenopathy. AJR. 2000;174:837–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chong V. Cervical lymphadenopathy: what radiologist need to know. Cancer Imaging. 2004;4:116–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ahuja AT, Ying M, Ho SY, Antonio G, Lee YP, King AD, Wong KT. Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes. Cancer Imaging. 2008;8:48–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sobin LH, Gospodaroqicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edition. Wiley-Blackwell November 2009Google Scholar
- Hermans R. Posttreatment imaging in head and neck cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66:501–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Nyuts S, Deraedt K, Dirix P, Hamaekers P, et al. Detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI after (chemo)radiotherapy: correlation between radiologic and histopathologic findings. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(4):960–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tshering Vogel DW, Zbaeren P, Geretschlaeger A, Vermathen P, De Keyzer F, Thoeny HC. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging including bi-exponential fitting for the detection of recurrent or residual tumour after (chemo)radiotherapy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:562–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hermans R, De Keyzer F, Vandecaveye V, Carp L. Imaging techniques. In: Hermans R, editor. Head and neck cancer imaging. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 33–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD. Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in the head and neck. Radiology. 2012;263(1):19–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Purohit BS, Ailianau A, Dulguerov N, Becker CD, Ratib O, Becker M. FDG-PET/CT pitfalls in oncological head and neck imaging. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:585–602.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar