Volume 15 Supplement 1

Proceedings of the International Cancer Imaging Society (ICIS) 15th Annual Teaching Course

Open Access

PET/MR imaging: current status and future direction

  • Heinz-Peter Schlemmer1
Cancer Imaging201515(Suppl 1):O32

https://doi.org/10.1186/1470-7330-15-S1-O32

Published: 2 October 2015

PET/CT has emerged as an important tool in oncology to detect, characterize, and follow-up various tumor entities. The integrated technology includes the respective advantageousness of PET and CT in a synergistic manner combining high sensitivity of PET with transmission correction and anatomic referencing by CT. PET/CT has been proven to be fast, robust and meanwhile widely available in oncologic centers. But for several tumor entities, e.g. cancers of the brain, liver, cervix or prostate, MRI would be beneficial compared to CT due to the superior soft tissue contrast and additionally functional information about e.g. tumor perfusion (DCE, T2*) and diffusion (DWI). On the other hand, sequential MR and PET/CT imaging has several limitations: patient repositioning may result in spatial mismatch and the various ways of the correction of misalignment are time consuming and limited; it is furthermore uncomfortable for critically ill patients, costly in terms of time and personal resources and inefficient from a work-flow perspective. Scientific and clinical considerations therefore argue for the benefits of simultaneous coregistration of MR and PET imaging in oncology. Simultaneous PET/MR furthermore reduces the X-ray exposures of the patients, which is an important issue particularly for young patients and patients who need multiple follow-up examinations.

Sequential and fully integrated whole-body 3.0 Tesla PET/MR scanners are meanwhile available from Philips, Siemens and GE. Initial limitations of the simultaneous PET/MR technology concerning the attenuation correction with MR alone have been extensively addressed. PET image reconstruction with accurate attenuation correction as well as quantification of local radiotracer uptake, i.e. calculation of the SUV, is now possible using the MR data [1]. Furthermore, simultaneous temporal and spatial coregistration of PET and MR data has also been successfully applied for MRI-gated PET measurements of moving organs/tumors in e.g. bronchial or liver cancer [2]. Initial feasibility studies have proven that PET/MR imaging can be advantages for tumor detection, staging as well as for therapy monitoring and follow-up in e.g. lung cancer, head and neck cancers, breast cancer, liver cancer, prostate cancer, lymphoma, seminal carcinoma etc. [37]. Beneficial applications are in particular for comprehensive management of solid tumors in children concerning tumor detection, characterization as well as treatment monitoring [8]. Promising applications have been published in particular for prostate cancer concerning whole-body PET/MR with 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand [9].

But despite an increasing body of knowledge about the application of sequential and simultaneous PET/MR in oncology various open questions still exist concerning the scientific and medical prospects and limitations. What unmet radiological needs are addressed by PET/MR from a scientific and clinical point of view? Is a hardware integration of PET and MR actually required from a clinical point of view? What are the clinical indications in which simultaneous PET/MR achieves higher diagnostic accuracy compared to subsequent MR and PET/CT imaging? Could sequential PET/CT and MR imaging followed by software-based image coregistration be sufficient in particular clinical situations? What are the essential added values of PET/MR compared to PET/CT? Can PET/MR be economically reasonable and reduce overall costs for therapy planning monitoring and follow-up?

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
German Cancer Research Center, Department of Radiology, INF 280

References

  1. Wehrl HF, Sauter AW, Divine MR, Pichler BJ: Combined PET/MR: a technology becomes mature. J Nucl Med. 2015, 56 (2): 165-8. 10.2967/jnumed.114.150318.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Fayad H, Schmidt H, Wuerslin C, Visvikis D: Reconstruction-Incorporated Respiratory Motion Correction in Clinical Simultaneous PET/MR Imaging for Oncology Applications. J Nucl Med. 2015, 56 (6): 884-9. 10.2967/jnumed.114.153007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jadvar H, Colletti PM: Competitive advantage of PET/MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2014, 83 (1): 84-94. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.028.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker M, Zaidi H: Imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the potential role of PET/MRI. Br J Radiol. 2014, 87 (1036):Google Scholar
  5. Gaertner FC, Fürst S, Schwaiger M: PET/MR: a paradigm shift. Cancer Imaging. 2013, 13: 36-52.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagade S, Fowler KJ, Schwarz JK, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F: PET/MRI Evaluation of Gynecologic Malignancies and Prostate Cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2015, 45 (4): 293-303. 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2015.03.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lai CH, Lin G, Yen TC, Liu FY: Molecular imaging in the management of gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2014, 135 (1): 156-62. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.07.092.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Partovi S, Kohan A, Rubbert C, Vercher-Conejero JL, Gaeta C, Yuh R, Zipp L, Herrmann KA, Robbin MR, Lee Z, Muzic RF, Faulhaber P, Ros PR: Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014, 4 (2): 202-12.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Afshar-Oromieh A, Haberkorn U, Schlemmer HP, Fenchel M, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Hadaschik BA, Kopp-Schneider A, Röthke M: Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI hybrid systems using a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: initial experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014, 41 (5): 887-97. 10.1007/s00259-013-2660-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Schlemmer 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement