Volume 14 Supplement 1

Proceedings of the International Cancer Imaging Society (ICIS) 14th Annual Teaching Course

Open Access

Global challenges of cancer imaging: perspective from different parts of the world: Asia

Cancer Imaging201414(Suppl 1):O3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1470-7330-14-S1-O3

Published: 9 October 2014

Asia accounts for about 60% of the world's population and half the global burden of cancer [1]. Due to the diverse economic development across the Asian continent, countries have highly variable health services development and healthcare infrastructure. Thus, there is disparity in access to services, especially resource intensive cancer management. All countries in Asia, except Japan are defined by the UN as 'less developed regions' and this reflects the limited resources in general. This presentation aims to describe the demographic characteristics of cancer in Asia, and highlight the challenges and main advancements of cancer imaging across this region.

Lung cancer is the most common cancer in men (35.2/100,000 persons) and breast cancer the most common cancer in women (29.1/100,000 women) in Asia.

The incidence rate of breast cancer in Asia is about 1/3 compared to North America (NA) and Western Europe (WE), although it is on a steady rise. However, the five year prevalence rate is manifold lower indicating that in proportion, there are fewer cancer survivors in Asia. With the exceptions of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, resources in most countries are inadequate for population-based organised screening mammography programmes. However, it is less clear if organised screening would be a cost-effective programme in Asia, due to the lower incidence rate as well as reduced sensitivity of mammography in Asian women with higher density breast tissue [2], and there is evidence that supplemental ultrasound screening increases the sensitivity for cancer detection in women with dense breasts [3].

Notably, in South East Asia (SEA) and East Asia (EA) compared to the rest of the world, the incidences of liver cancer, oesophageal cancer, stomach cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer are relatively high, although on the decline. Liver cancer is the second and third most common cancer in men in SEA and EA respectively, and fifth most common cancer in women. More than 70% of the new cases of liver cancer are from Asia, of which 50% are from China. Recent studies have advanced the use of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl dimeglumine (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced MRI for its superior sensitivity for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma, especially small tumors [4], and 11C-acetate PET imaging for detection of well-differentiated tumors [5]. Oesophageal cancer is the fifth most common cancer in EA men. Asia accounts to about 75% of new cases, specifically the 'asian oesophageal cancer belt' that extends from Turkey to Mongolia and Western/Northern China. The majority of these are squamous cell carcinoma in histology. Studies have found 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET to be useful in disease staging (particularly upstaging), and predictive of outcome of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and disease survival [6]. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is the sixth and fourteenth most common cancer in men across SEA and EA respectively. 80% of new cases are from this region, and are focussed around Southern China, Taiwan and SEA. Current research has evaluated the roles of diffusion MRI for tissue characterisation [7] and 18F-FDG PET for prognostication [8].

In recent years the cancer burden in Asia and its developing countries has surged, and is forecasted to continue to rise. Resources for the provision and development of diagnostic imaging which plays an essential role in early detection and management of cancer must be supported and strengthened across the region.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong

References

  1. GLOBOCAN. 2012. [http://globocan.iarc.fr]
  2. Yoo KB, Kwon JA, Cho E, et al.: Is mammography for breast cancer screening cost-effective in both western and Asian countries?: results of a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013, 14: 4141–4149. 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.7.4141PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Chae EY, Kim HH, Cha JH, et al.: Evaluation of screening whole breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts. J Ultrasound Med 2013, 32: 1573–78. 10.7863/ultra.32.9.1573PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu X, Zou L, Liu F, et al.: Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. PLOS one 2013, 8: 1–9.Google Scholar
  5. Ho CL, Yu SC, Yeung DW: 11C-acetate PET imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma and other liver masses. J Nucl Med 2003, 44: 213–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yanagawa M, Tatsumi M, Miyata H, et al.: Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 2012, 53: 872–80. 10.2967/jnumed.111.098699PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lai V, Li X, Lee VHF, et al.: Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging: Comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and post-chemoradiation fibrosis. Eur Radiology 2013, 23: 2793–2801. 10.1007/s00330-013-2889-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang KP, Tsang NM, Liao CT, et al.: Prognostic significance of 18F-FDG PET parameters and plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2012, 53: 21–8. 10.2967/jnumed.111.090696PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Khong; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement