Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of cost and effectiveness outcomes and cost-effectiveness analyses

From: Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for investigation of persistent or recurrent neutropenic fever in high-risk haematology patients

 

FDG-PET/CT group

Standard CT group

Difference / ICER / NMB

Mean

95% CI

Mean

95% CI

Mean

95% CI

Total cost

49,563

36,867

65,133

57,574

44,837

73,347

-8,011

-27,998

13,986

QALY

0.285

0.283

0.287

0.284

0.282

0.286

0.001

-0.001

0.004

ICER: Cost per QALY gained

FDG-PET/CT dominates a

-23,165,055

30,415,796

NMB at WTP = $50,000

8,082

-13,459

29,624

NMB at WTP = $100,000

8,154

-13,516

29,823

Antimicrobial rationalisation

81.8%

71.9%

91.2%

65.1%

51.7%

76.2%

16.7%

-0.3%

33.0%

ICER: Cost per patient change in antimicrobial therapy

FDG-PET/CT dominates a

-446,892

161,378

Mortality at 6 months

16.3%

6.3%

31.0%

18.6%

7.9%

34.5%

-2.3%

-17.9%

13.1%

ICER: Cost per death averted

FDG-PET/CT dominates a

-1,976,110

2,207,504

  1. a FDG-PET/CT dominates indicates that FDG-PET/CT is less costly and more effective