Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | Cancer Imaging

Fig. 1

From: Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for investigation of persistent or recurrent neutropenic fever in high-risk haematology patients

Fig. 1

Cost-effectiveness analysis plane for (A) QALY and (B) antimicrobial rationalisation outcomes. The red dot represents the ICER point estimate which sits in the south-east quadrant, indicating that the FDG-PET/CT intervention is cheaper and more effective compared to standard CT. NW = north-west quadrant; intervention more costly, less effective. NE = north-east quadrant; intervention more costly, more effective. SE = south-east quadrant; intervention less costly, more effective. SW = south-west quadrant; intervention less costly, less effective

Back to article page

Cancer Imaging

ISSN: 1470-7330

Contact us