Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline features of p53 status in the training and validation cohorts

From: Prediction of p53 mutation status in rectal cancer patients based on magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram: a study of machine learning

Characteristics

Training cohort (n = 210)

Validation cohort (n = 90)

p53 WT

(n = 90)

p53 Mut

(n = 120)

P- value

p53 WT

(n = 44)

p53 Mut

(n = 46)

P- value

Gender (n, %)

Male

57 (63.33)

91 (75.83)

0.066

33 (75.00)

31 (67.39)

0.426

Female

33 (36.67)

29 (24.17)

11 (25.00)

15 (32.61)

CRM status (n, %)

Negative

70 (77.78)

91 (75.83)

0.742

30 (68.18)

37 (80.43)

0.183

Positive

20 (22.22)

29 (24.17)

14 (31.82)

9 (19.57)

Mri-EMVI status (n, %)

Negative

71 (78.89)

90 (75.00)

0.51

33 (75.00)

31 (67.39)

0.426

Positive

19 (21.11)

30 (25.00)

11 (25.00)

15 (32.61)

ACI status (n, %)

Negative

86 (95.56)

115 (95.83)

0.806

38 (86.36)

45 (97.83)

0.102

Positive

4 (4.44)

5 (4.17)

6 (13.64)

1 (2.17)

Lymph Node (n, %)

No met

38 (42.22)

40 (33.33)

0.187

16 (36.36)

17 (36.96)

0.953

Met

52 (57.78)

80 (66.67)

28 (63.64)

29 (63.04)

Tumor stage (n, %)

T1-T2

23 (25.56)

40 (33.33)

0.224

10 (22.73)

7 (15.22)

0.363

T3-T4

67 (74.44)

80 (66.67)

34 (77.27)

39 (84.78)

Age (years)

63.57 ± 11.23

64.66 ± 9.89

0.456

64.50 ± 9.36

63.78 ± 10.17

0.729

CEA (ng/mL)

6.41 ± 8.46

12.92 ± 51.98

0.241

17.33 ± 52.44

8.13 ± 11.69

0.249

Tumor size (cm3)

19.79 ± 24.61

16.00 ± 15.70

0.175

22.86 ± 30.02

20.45 ± 35.23

0.728

Dis (cm)

8.27 ± 3.91

7.83 ± 3.67

0.397

7.63 ± 3.80

8.31 ± 3.52

0.382

  1. Abbreviations: WT, wild-type; Mut, mutant; CRM, circumferential resection margin; EMVI, extramural vascular invasion; ACI, anal canal invasion; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; Dis, distance from the end of the convex edge of the tumor to the edge of the anus. Data were presented as counts with percentages or means ± standard deviations