Skip to main content

Table 4 Median scores of qualitative image analyses

From: Quantum iterative reconstruction on a photon-counting detector CT improves the quality of hepatocellular carcinoma imaging

Quality criteria

FBP

QIR-#

QIR-1

QIR-2

QIR-3

QIR-4

Late arterial phase

 Image noise

1 (1–1)

1 (1–1)

2 (2–2)

2 (2 –3)

3 (3–3)

4 (4–4)

 Image artifacts

1 (1–2)

2 (2–2)

2 (2–2)

3 (2–3)

3 (3–3)

4 (4–4)

 Lesion conspicuity

0 (0 –0)

1 (1–1)

1 (1–2)

2 (2–2)

3 (2–3)

4 (3–4)

 Overall image quality

1 (1–1)

1.5 (1 –2)

2 (2–2)

2 (2–3)

3 (3–3)

4 (3–4)

Portal venous phase

 Image noise

1 (1–1)

1 (1–2)

2 (2–2)

3 (2–3)

3 (3–4)

4 (4–4)

 Image artifacts

1 (1–2)

2 (2–2)

2 (2–3)

3 (2–3)

3 (3–4)

4 (4–4)

 Lesion conspicuity

0 (0–0)

1 (0–1)

1 (1–2)

2 (2–3)

3 (2–3)

4 (3–4)

 Overall image quality

1 (1–1)

1 (1–2)

2 (2–2)

2 (2–3)

3 (3–3)

4 (4–4)

Delayed phase

 Image noise

1 (1–1)

1 (1–1)

2 (1–2)

2 (2–3)

3 (3–3)

4 (4–4)

 Image artifacts

1 (1–2)

2 (1.25–2)

2 (2–2)

3 (2–3)

3 (3–4)

4 (4–4)

 Lesion conspicuity

0 (0–0)

1 (0–1)

1 (1–2)

2 (2–2)

3 (2–3)

3 (3–4)

 Overall image quality

1 (1–1)

1 (1–2)

2 (2–2)

2 (2–3)

3 (3–3.25)

4 (4–4)

  1. Interquartile ranges are presented in parentheses