Skip to main content

Table 4 Predictor studies eligible for pooled analysis about adjusted HRs

From: Imaging features based on CT and MRI for predicting prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center study and meta-analysis

Study ID

Country

Imaging examination method

Definition of disease

Trail Group

Control Group

Follow-up years

Primary endpoints

HR estimate

HR

95%CI

P value

NOS score

K value

    

NO.of Hypoenhancement at arterial phase

NO.of Hyperenhancement at arterial phase

        

Zhang 2020 [34]

China

MRI

ICC

40

28

4.7

OS

paper

1.878

1.063–3.320

0.030

8

0.83

Teraoku 2020 [21]

Japan

CT

IMCC

32

8

7.0

OS

paper

6.680

1.160–128.300

0.030

7

NA

Kim 2011 [18]

Korea

CT

IMCC

49

15

5.5

EFS

paper

3.011

1.252–7.238

0.014

7

NA

Fujita 2017 [29]

Japan

CT

IMCC

13

34

11.0

EFS

paper

5.853

2.069–17.399

 < 0.001

8

NA

Ariizumi 2011 [20]

Japan

CT

IMCC

109

25

15.0

OS

paper

2.740

NA

0.045

8

NA

    

NO. of Infiltrative tumor margin

NO. of absence

        

Kim 2019 [31]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

NA

NA

8.0

EFS

paper

2.130

0.890–5.110

0.090

8

NA

Jiang 2011 [25]

China

CT or MRI

ICC

151

193

10.0

OS

paper

2.234

1.659–3.009

 < 0.001

8

NA

Park 2021 [30]

Korea

CT

IMCC

27

206

4.8

EFS

paper

1.630

1.030–2.590

0.040

7

0.99

This study

China

CT

ICC

85

76

15.0

OS

paper

2.565

1.633–4.029

 < 0.001

8

NA

EFS

paper

2.252

1.478–3.432

 < 0.001

Rhee 2022 [24]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

32

176

8.0

OS

paper

NA

NA

NA

8

NA

    

NO. of Bile duct invasion

NO. of absence

        

Kim 2019 [31]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

33

21

8.0

OS

paper

2.040

0.770–5.40

0.151

8

NA

EFS

paper

2.170

0.860–5.460

0.101

Rhee 2022 [24]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

116

92

8.0

OS

paper

1.886

1.271–2.799

0.002

8

NA

This study

China

CT

ICC

87

74

15.0

OS

paper

1.186

0.757–1.860

0.457

8

NA

Min 2019 [22]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

54

80

8.0

OS

paper

NA

NA

NA

8

0.75–0.95

EFS

paper

NA

NA

NA

Jin 2022 [40]

China

MRI

IMCC

69

162

7.8

OS

paper

NA

NA

NA

8

NA

EFS

paper

NA

NA

NA

Park 2021 [30]

Korea

CT

IMCC

112

121

4.8

EFS

paper

NA

NA

NA

7

0.99

    

NO. of Necrosis sign

NO. of absence

        

Aherne 2018 [35]

USA

CT

ICC

25

41

8.0

OS

paper

3.180

1.290–7.860

0.012

7

NA

EFS

paper

1.950

1.070–3.540

0.060

NA

Min 2019 [22]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

77

57

8.0

OS

paper

NA

NA

NA

8

0.75–0.95

EFS

paper

NA

NA

NA

Jin 2022 [40]

China

MRI

IMCC

145

86

7.8

OS

paper

NA

NA

NA

8

NA

EFS

paper

NA

NA

NA

NA

    

NO. of perihilar tumor location

NO. of peripheral tumor location

        

Jiang 2011 [25]

China

CT or MRI

ICC

37

307

10.0

OS

paper

1.162

0.711–1.899

0.549

8

NA

Jin 2022 [40]

China

MRI

IMCC

102

129

7.8

OS

paper

NA

NA

NA

8

NA

EFS

paper

NA

NA

NA

Rhee 2022 [24]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

66

142

8.0

OS

paper

NA

NA

NA

8

NA

    

NO. of The area of DWI Diffusion restriction accounted for the tumor area < 1/3

NO. of The area of DWI Diffusion restriction accounted for the tumor area > 1/3

        

Promsorn 2022 [33]

Thailand

MRI

IMCC

29

44

5.0

OS

paper

2.039

1.180–3.535

0.011

8

NA

Lee 2016 [26]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

43

48

5.0

OS

paper

2.660

NA

0.024

8

NA

    

NO.of Intermediate group

NO.of Hypointense group

        

Koh 2016 [17]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

21

18

5.0

OS

paper

NA

NA

NA

8

NA

EFS

paper

5.000

1.629–20.352

0.012

Min 2019 [22]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

8

126

8.0

OS

paper

NA

NA

NA

8

0.75–0.95

EFS

paper

NA

NA

NA

    

NO. of Peritumoral arterial hyperenhancement

NO. of absence

        

Min 2019 [22]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

39

95

8.0

OS

paper

NA

NA

NA

8

0.75–0.95

EFS

paper

NA

NA

NA

Rhee 2022 [24]

Korea

MRI

IMCC

116

92

8.0

OS

paper

NA

NA

NA

8

NA