Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate associations of baseline data and spectral CT parameters with Overall survival

From: Early evaluation of liver metastasis using spectral CT to predict outcome in patients with colorectal cancer treated with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab

Variables

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR (95% CI)

p Value

HR (95% CI)

p Value

IoD

1.383 (1.268–1.508)

 < 0.001

1.238(1.089–1.408)

 < 0.001

CS

2.347 (1.845–2.985)

 < 0.001

1.314 (0.849–2.034)

0.219

CEA

2.284 (1.483–3.517)

 < 0.001

1.670 (1.016–2.745)

0.043

 ≥ 31.7 ng/mL versus < 31.7 ng/mL

BLD (mm)

1.025 (1.010–1.040)

 < 0.001

1.022 (1.005–1.038)

0.010

Boundary

1.112 (0.738–1.675)

0.612

 

Clear versus Unclear

Texture

0.866 (0.573–1.310)

0.496

 

Homogeneous versus Heterogeneous

Shape

0.749 (0.493–1.141)

0.179

 

Round versus lobulated

Liver oligometastasis

0.991 (0.636–1.547)

0.971

 

No and Yes

Histologic grade of the primary tumor

0.630 (0.415–0.956)

0.029

1.103 (0.686–1.775)

0.686

Well/moderately differentiated versus Others

K-RAS

3.057 (1.954–4.781)

 < 0.001

2.027 (1.192–3.449)

0.009

Mutant versus Wild type

Location of the primary tumor

1.305 (0.867–1.964)

0.203

 

Colon versus Rectal

Clinical T stage of the primary tumor

2.158 (1.396–3.336)

 < 0.001

0.992 (0.594–1.656)

0.975

T4 versus T2/T3

Clinical N stage of the primary tumor

1.945 (1.277–2.962)

0.002

1.565 (0.989–2.474)

0.056

N2 versus N1-0

Type of liver metastasis

1.857 (1.218–2.832)

0.004

1.877 (1.179–2.988)

0.008

Metachronous versus Synchronous

Sites of metastases

1.150 (0.694–1.908)

0.587

 

Liver and extrahepatic versus Liver only

Systemic therapy scheme

1.167 (0.551–1.333)

0.493

 

FOLFOX versus FOLFIRI

2-RECIST1.1

1.103 (0.481–2.530)

0.817

 

R + versus R-

  1. Note: HR Hazard ratio, IoD Iodine concentration, CS Spectral curve slope, CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen, BLD Baseline longest diameter