Table 1 Performance of 18F-FDOPA in disease detection
Authors | Year | Patients (#) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) | Optimal cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pafundi et al. | 2013 | 10 | 72.7 | 100 | 100 | 14.3 | 73.9 | NA (visual analysis) |
Ledezma et al. | 2009 | 21 | 95.2 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA (visual analysis) |
Tripathi et al. | 2009 | 15 | 100 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA (visual analysis) |
Chen et al. | 2006 | 81 | 98 | 86 | 95 | 95 | 95 | T/S > 0.75 |
Beuthien-Baumann et al. | 2003 | 19 | 94 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA (visual analysis) |