Skip to main content

Table 5 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of chest computed tomography (CT), textural features, 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (FDG PET/CT) and sonographic findings

From: Quantitative computed tomography texture analysis: can it improve diagnostic accuracy to differentiate malignant lymph nodes?

Variable

AUC

SE (AUC)

95% CI

Se (%)

Sp (%)

Short-axis diameter, ≥ 10 mm

0.659

0.038

0.585–0.732

93

58.7

Compactness on CTTA

0.666

0.051

0.566–0.766

10.6

100

Normalized SD on CTTA

0.742

0.046

0.652–0.833

8.2

100

FDG PET/CT

 SUVmax ≥ 2.5

0.639

0.042

0.556–0.721

94.4

55.8

 SUVmax ≥ 5

0.739

0.042

0.657–0.821

74.7

94.3

 SUVPeak ≥ 4

0.739

0.041

0.658–0.820

73

95.6

 SUVmax ≥ 2.5 and HU < 70

0.738

0.044

0.652–0.823

87.5

82.5

Size on EBUS, ≥10 mm

0.654

0.036

0.583–0.724

95.3

54.6

Round shape

0.598

0.043

0.513–0.682

71.4

72

Heterogeneous echogenicity

0.632

0.037

0.561–0.704

51

95

Coagulation necrosis sign

0.542

0.021

0.502–0.582

20.2

100

  1. AUC, Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, Confidence interval; EBUS, Endobronchial ultrasound; SD, Standard deviation; Se, Sensitivity; Sp, Specificity; SUVmax, Standard maximal uptake value
  2. Analyses was performed using 1 = benign and 0 = malignant