Skip to main content

Table 4 Diagnostic performance of conventional PET/CT, PSF PET/CT, and pelvic MRI for differentiating T3-4 stage from T1-2 stage in patients with rectal cancer

From: Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT using point spread function reconstruction on initial staging of rectal cancer: a comparison study with conventional PET/CT and pelvic MRI

 

Conventional PET/CT

PSF-PET/CT

Pelvic MRI

Sensitivity, %

63.6 (0.45 to 0.80)

57.6 (0.39 to 0.74)

70.0 (0.51 to 0.84)

Specificity, %

93.8 (0.70 to 0.99)

93.8 (0.70 to 0.99)

81.2 (0.54 to 0.96)

Accuracy, %

73.5 (0.59 to 0.85)

69.4 (0.55 to 0.82)

73.5 (0.59 to 0.85)

PPV, %

95.5 (0.77 to 0.99)

95.0 (0.75 to 0.99)

88.8 (0.70 to 0.98)

NPV, %

55.6 (0.35 to 0.74)

51.7 (0.33 to 0.71)

56.5 (0.59 to 0.85)

Positive LR

10.2 (1.50 to 69.10)

9.2 (1.30 to 62.80)

3.7 (1.30 to 10.60)

Negative LR

0.38 (0.24 to 0.62)

0.45 (0.30 to 0.69)

0.37 (0.21 to 0.66)

  1. The numbers in parentheses represent the 95% confidence interval
  2. LR likelihood ratio, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, PSF point spread function