Skip to main content

Table 2 Differences in the PCPV depiction rates for each part of the mediastinum between non-ECG gated and ECG gated CT

From: Identification of the pericardiacophrenic vein on CT

Ā 

PCPV depiction rate score

Ā 

Observer 1

1

2

3

4

p-value

ā€ƒSection 1

ā€ƒā€ƒNon-ECG gated

11 (32)

10 (29)

6 (18)

7 (21)

0.14

ā€ƒā€ƒECG gated

3 (14)

5 (23)

10 (45)

4 (18)

ā€ƒSection 2

ā€ƒā€ƒNon-ECG gated

5 (15)

9 (26)

11 (32)

9 (26)

0.35

ā€ƒā€ƒECG gated

3 (14)

4 (18)

6 (27)

9 (41)

ā€ƒSection 3

ā€ƒā€ƒNon-ECG gated

3 (9)

5 (15)

8 (24)

18 (53)

0.96

ā€ƒā€ƒECG gated

1 (5)

3 (14)

7 (32)

11 (50)

ā€ƒSection 4*

ā€ƒā€ƒNon-ECG gated

9 (26)

10 (29)

10 (29)

5 (15)

0.0032

ā€ƒā€ƒECG gated

1 (5)

4 (18)

7 (32)

10 (45)

Observer 2

ā€ƒSection 1

ā€ƒā€ƒNon-ECG gated

11 (32)

12 (35)

3 (9)

8 (24)

0.54

ā€ƒā€ƒECG gated

6 (27)

5 (23)

7 (32)

4 (18)

ā€ƒSection 2

ā€ƒā€ƒNon-ECG gated

7 (21)

7 (21)

14 (41)

6 (18)

0.34

ā€ƒā€ƒECG gated

3 (14)

3 (14)

11 (50)

5 (23)

ā€ƒSection 3

ā€ƒā€ƒNon-ECG gated

3 (9)

6 (18)

9 (26)

16 (47)

0.69

ā€ƒā€ƒECG gated

3 (14)

2 (9)

5 (23)

12 (55)

ā€ƒSection 4

ā€ƒā€ƒNon-ECG gated

11 (32)

6 (18)

10 (29)

7 (21)

0.069

ā€ƒā€ƒECG gated

3 (14)

3 (14)

8 (36)

8 (36)

  1. ECG electrocardiographic, PCPV pericardiacophrenic veins
  2. * The differences between the data obtained using non-ECG gated and ECG gated CT were statistically significant (pā€‰<ā€‰0.05). The figures in parentheses are percentages