Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of the included studies

From: Comparison of efficacy and complications of endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

year

country

study design

No.Patients in study

No.

PTBD

No.

EBD

age(years, median or range)

Male

(%)

Maligancy type

Quality assessment*

Speer AG

1987

Enghland

RCT

75

36

39

50–87

/

primary carcinoma of the pancreas, gallbladder, or bileducts

4

Piñol V

2002

Spain

RCT

54

28

26

73

74

primary carcinoma of the pancreas, gallbladder, or bileducts,or regional lymph node metastasis

5

Lee SH

2007

South Korea

retrospective

134(34 IPTBD)

66

34

67

69

Klatskin’s tumor

8

Saluja SS

2008

India

RCT

54

27

27

51

33

Gallbladder Cancer

5

Paik WH

2009

South Korea

retrospective

85

41

44

66

68

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma

8

Kloek JJ

2010

Netherlands

retrospective

101

11

90

61

69

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma

7

Choi J

2012

South Korea

retrospective

60

31

29

59

77

hepatocellular carcinoma

7

Walter T

2013

Canada

retrospective

129

42

87

66

60

Klatskintumors

8

Huang X

2015

China

retrospective

270(170 no PBD)

45

55(ENBD 18,ERBS 37)

58

71

extrahepatic bile duct cancer

7

Kim KM

2015

South Korea

retrospective

106

62

44

42–89

64

Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas

8

Inamdar S

2016

USA

retrospective

9135

1690

7445

70

50

pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma

6

Kishi Y

2016

Japan

retrospective

171

98

72

31–86

78

biliary tract cancer

7

Jo JH

2017

South Korea

retrospective

98

43

55(13 ENBD, 42 EBS)

63.5(29–82)

61

Klatskin tumor

8

Miura F

2017

Japan

retrospective

88

25

63

70(42–85)

70

extrahepatic bile duct cancer

7

  1. *retrospective cohort studies was evaluated using 9-star Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale; RCT studies was evaluated using 7-point Modified Jadad Score