Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate analysis of predictors of CR

From: Lipiodol retention pattern assessed by cone beam computed tomography during conventional transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: accuracy and correlation with response

Factors

OR

95 % CI

p

Patients and tumor variables

Sex (male/female)

0.73

(0.51,1.04)

0.01

Age(y) ≥ 60 vs. <60

2.07

(0.46,9.40)

0.48

Size ≥ 30 mm vs. <30 mm

0.32

(0.08,1.32)

0.35

Location

Left vs. Right

1.01

(0.25,4.12)

1.00

Unifocal vs. Multifocal

0.32

(0.04,2.88)

0.29

Child-Pugh

A vs. B

0.83

(0.17,4.01)

0.82

AFP (≥ 400 vs. < 400)

4.07

(0.46,35.75)

0.25

Prior hepatic resection

Yes vs. No

0.57

(1.02,1.30)

1.15

Lipiodol retention on Fluoroscopy

Excellent vs. Moderate and Poor

0.76

(0.22,2.64)

0.75

Lipiodol retention on CBCT

Excellent vs. Moderate and Poor

5.17

(1.13,23.55)

0.03

Etiology

Hepatitis B virus vs. negative

2.19

(0.56,8.61)

0.27