Skip to main content

Table 3 Detailed representation of results in the different assessment modes

From: A study on the value of computer-assisted assessment for SPECT/CT-scans in sentinel lymph node diagnostics of penile cancer as well as clinical reliability and morbidity of this procedure

 

Column 1

2

3

4

5

6

Row 1

   

Conventional consensual assessment by specialists

Software assessment

Software-assessment corrected by specialists

2

Number (n)

inguinal (“true”)

Lynph Nodes (LNs)

83

128

83

3

R/L

47/36

65/63

42/41

4

Median

3

5

3

5

Range

0–6

0–12

0–9

6

pelvic (“true”) LNs

44

87

60

7

R/L

27/17

51/36

39/21

8

Median

1

1

1

9

Range

0–8

0–13

0–11

10

all (“true”) LNs

127

215

143

11

R/L

74/53

116/99

81/62

12

Median

5

6

4

13

Range

0–13

1–19

0–15

14

all (“false”) LNs

-

588

660

15

Median

-

20

22

16

Range

-

3–74

3–78

17

all (“true”) and (“false”) LNs (findings)

127

803

803

18

Median

5

29

29

19

Range

0–13

6–80

6–80

20

Required assessment time (min)

 

Average

14.6

0.91

4.4

21

 

Median

14.7

0.93

4.2

22

 

Range

12.3–17.7

0.7–1.0

2.3–7.9