Volume 15 Supplement 1

Proceedings of the International Cancer Imaging Society (ICIS) 15th Annual Teaching Course

Open Access

Imaging the Ancients

  • Rodney H Reznek1
Cancer Imaging201515(Suppl 1):O21

https://doi.org/10.1186/1470-7330-15-S1-O21

Published: 2 October 2015

Mummified remains and artefacts, since their discovery, have attracted the interest of scientific investigators. Consequently virtually every paleoimaging modality has been applied to bioarchaeology soon after its technological development. Indeed, the first use of X-rays in mummy investigation was only one year after William Röntgen discovered X-rays in 1895 when, in March 1896, Carl Koenig, a German physicist, published the first X-rays involving mummies, that of an Egyptian mummified cat and the knees of an Egyptian child mummy. The first systematic analysis of a major mummy collection was undertaken at the Field Museum in Chicago in 1931. CT scans of mummies were first carried out in 1977. Not surprisingly, over the years, several problems have been identified in interpreting the images on CT. The presence of many layers of mummy wrapping, organ removal, diagenetic changes, particularly desiccation, may all result in confusion. Special problems in X-ray and CT scanning arise when the diagenetic changes are so massive that the remaining tissues, including bone, are severely degraded - a feature best shown by bog bodies, all of which date to the Northern European Iron Age (approximately 500 BC to 500 AD).

Recent technological advances have made MDCT an especially useful means for presentation of findings of anthropological inquiry as exemplified in a brilliant recent exhibition at the British Museum. However, this short lecture will show an almost unique personal experience of imaging of mummies performed over almost a decade in the mid-80s and early 90s. Investigations were undertaken of a bog body discovered in Lindow near Manchester, Muisca bodies discovered in the Andes, and Egyptian mummies from Fayum. All three projects revealed fascinating insights into the lifestyle of these ancients and answered several lines of anthropological inquiry. This presentation will illustrate examples from each of these projects.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London

References

  1. Beckett RG: Paleoimaging: a review of applications and challenges. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014, 10 (3): 423-36. 10.1007/s12024-014-9541-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wade AD, et al: Scenes from the past. Multidetector CT of Egyptian mummies of the Redpath Museum. Radiographics. 2012, 32: 1235-1250. 10.1148/rg.324125704.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cox SL: A critical look at mummy CT scanning. Anat Rec. 2015, 298 (6): 1099-1100. 10.1002/ar.23149.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Previgliano CH, et al: Radiology evaluation of the Llullaillaco mummies. AJR. 2003, 181: 1473-1479. 10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811473.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Reznek RH, et al: Computed tomography of Lindow Man. Lindow Man, The Body in the Bog. Edited by: Stead I.M., Bourke, J.G., Brothwell, D. 1985, British Museum PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Reznek 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement