Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population

From: Post-neoadjuvant treatment pancreatic cancer resectability and outcome prediction using CT, 18F-FDG PET/MRI and CA 19–9

Characteristics

Values

Age (mean ± SD, y)

66.7 ± 8.4

Sex

 Male

55 (45.8%)

 Female

65 (54.2%)

Tumor location

 Head or uncinate process

73 (60.8%)

 Body

37 (30.8%)

 Tail

10 (8.3%)

Tumor size (mean ± SD, cm)

 Baseline

3.0 ± 1.1 (1.3–8.5)

 Post-NAT

2.4 ± 1.0 (0.8–6.9)

Baseline CT resectability category

 Resectable

17 (14.2%)

 Borderline resectable

71 (59.2%)

 Locally advanced

32 (26.7%)

Tumor response evaluation according to RECIST 1.1

 Partial response

47 (39.2%)

 Stable disease

58 (48.3%)

 Progressive disease

15 (12.5%)

Serum CA 19–9 level (mean ± SD, U/mL)

 Baseline

1718.8 ± 3228.8 (1.0–12,000.0)

 Post-NAT

461.3 ± 1636.5 (1.0–12,000.0)

Serum CA 19–9 response

 Responder (normalized at follow-up)

31 (25.8%)

 Non-responder (nonnormalized or nonelevated CA 19–9 level)

89 (74.2%)

Types of surgery

 Pancreaticoduodenectomy

61 (50. 8%)

 Distal pancreatectomy

24 (20.0%)

 Total pancreatectomy

6 (5.0%)

 Diagnostic laparotomy or palliative surgery

5 (4.2%)

 Subtotal pancreatectomy

2 (1.7%)

 No surgical procedure

22 (18.3%)

Resection margina

 Negative

69 (74.2%)

 Positive

24 (25.8%)

Pathologic T staginga

 T0 (no residual tumor)

7 (7.5%)

 T1

33 (35.5%)

 T2

32 (34.4%)

 T3

16 (17.2%)

 T4

5 (5.4%)

Pathologic N staginga

 N0

55 (59.1%)

 N1

34 (36.6%)

 N2

4 (4.3%)

Tumor gradea

 Well-differentiated

10 (10.8%)

 Moderately differentiated

68 (73.1%)

 Poorly differentiated or undifferentiated

8 (8.6%)

 No residual tumor

7 (7.5%)

Tumor regression grade according to the College of American Pathologistsa

 0 (complete response, no viable cancer cells)

7 (7.5%)

 1 (near complete response, single cells or rare groups of cancer cells)

23 (24.7%)

 2 (partial response, residual cancer with evident tumor regression, but more than single cells or rare groups of cancer cells)

38 (40.9%)

 3 (poor or no response, extensive residual cancer with no evident tumor regression)

25 (26.9%)

Large vessel invasion confirmed on pathologic analysisa

7 (7.5%)

 Superior mesenteric artery

2 (2.2%)

 Main portal vein

2 (2.2%)

 Superior mesenteric vein

1 (1.1%)

 Common hepatic artery

1 (1.1%)

 Celiac axis

1 (1.1%)

 No large vessel invasion

86 (92.5%)

Lymphatic invasiona

 Yes

17 (18.3%)

 No

76 (81.7%)

Microscopic vascular invasiona

 Yes

23 (24.7%)

 No

70 (75.3%)

Perineural invasiona

 Yes

65 (69.9%)

 No

28 (30.1%)

SUVmax at tumor-vessel contact on post-NAT PET/MRI (mean ± SD)b

5.0 ± 3.2 (1.5–16.3)

ADC value at tumor-vessel contact on post-NAT PET/MRI(mean ± SD, × 10–3 mm2/s)c

1.49 ± 0.37 (1.03–2.40)

  1. SD Standard deviation, NAT Neoadjuvant therapy, RECIST Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor, CA 19–9 Carbohydrate antigen 19–9, PET Positron emission tomography, FDG Fluorodeoxyglucose, SUVmax The maximum standardized uptake value, ADC Apparent diffusion coefficient
  2. aData are available in 93 patients who underwent curative-intent surgery
  3. bData are available in 68 patients who had mild or moderate to intense FDG uptake
  4. cData are available in 110 patients who had tumor-vessel contact; other 10 patients had resectable tumor without tumor-vessel contact