Skip to main content

Table 5 Diagnostic Performance of CEUS LI-RADS in RF+ and RF− patients in prospective study

From: CEUS LI-RADS for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in individuals without LI-RADS-defined hepatocellular carcinoma risk factors

Criteria

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

Accuracy (%)

PPV

NPV

CEUS LR-5 in RF+ group

74.5 (41/55) [70.1,84.8]

94.1 (32/34) [86.1,97.7]

82.0 (73/89) [75.8,88.5]

95.3 (41/43) [88.9,97.6]

69.6 (32/46) [58.5,76.1]

CEUS LR-5 in RF− group

72.2 (13/18) [65.3,78.2]

90.0 (18/20) [83.4,94.5]

81.5 (31/38) [74.3,88.1]

86.7 (13/15) [81.2,92.3]

78.2 (18/23) [72.1,85.4]

P

0.845

0.577

0.953

0.030

0.446

  1. Note: Data in parentheses are numerator/denominator and data in brackets are 95% confidence intervals. CEUS LI-RADS conrrast-enhanced US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System, PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value
Back to article page

Cancer Imaging

ISSN: 1470-7330

Contact us