Skip to main content

Table 4 The consistency of treatment response assessment

From: Semiautomated pelvic lymph node treatment response evaluation for patients with advanced prostate cancer: based on MET-RADS-P guidelines

Comparison

Target lesions

Nontarget lesions

Nonpathological lesions

Automated segmentation vs. Manual correction

0.92 (0.86–0.98)

0.82 (0.74–0.90)

0.71 (0.50–0.92)

R1 vs. Automated segmentation

0.89 (0.81–0.96)

0.81 (0.73–0.89)

0.68 (0.47–0.88)

R2 vs. Automated segmentation

0.86 (0.79–0.94)

0.78 (0.69–0.87)

0.60 (0.37–0.82)

R1 vs. R2

0.90 (0.85–0.97)

0.95 (0.90–0.99)

0.84 (0.68–0.99)

R1 vs. Manual correction

0.96 (0.93–1.00)

0.99 (0.97–1.00)

0.96 (0.88–1.00)

R2 vs. Manual correction

0.94 (0.89–0.99)

0.96 (0.92–0.99)

0.88 (0.73–1.00)

  1. R1 an attending radiologist with 8 years of reading experience, R2 a fellow radiologist with 4 years of reading experience