Skip to main content

Table 3 Patient-based analysis on the diagnostic accuracy of PET/MRI and MRI in determining TNM stage. Positive T stage was regarded as ≥T2b

From: Diagnostic efficiency of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI alone, and SUV and ADC values in staging of primary uterine cervical cancer

Stage

PET/MRI

MRI

Sens

Spec

Acc

PPV

NPV

AUC (95% CI)

Sens

Spec

Acc

PPV

NPV

AUC (95% CI)

T stage (≥T2b 11/33)

91%

86%

88%

77%

95%

0.89 (0.76–1.00)

100%

50%

67%

50%

100%

0.75 (0.59–0.91)

N stage (N1 17/33)

59%

88%

73%

83%

67%

0.73 (0.56–0.91)

71%

75%

73%

75%

71%

0.73 (0.55–0.91)

M stage (M1 5/33)

60%

100%

94%

100%

93%

0.80 (0.53–1.00)

60%

74%

72%

30%

91%

0.67 (0.40–0.94)

  1. Sens sensitivity, Spec specificity, Acc accuracy, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, AUC area under the curve, CI confidence interval