|
Type
|
MD
|
FA
|
MK
|
KA
|
RK
|
|---|
|
CCRCC
|
3.08 ± 0.23
|
0.26 ± 0.07
|
0.43 ± 0.08
|
0.57 ± 0.16
|
0.37 ± 0.11
|
|
AML
|
1.52 ± 0.24
|
0.23 ± 0.05
|
1.32 ± 0.16
|
1.42 ± 0.23
|
1.41 ± 0.29
|
|
RO
|
2.93 ± 0.30
|
0.16 ± 0.04
|
0.81 ± 0.08
|
0.86 ± 0.16
|
0.69 ± 0.08
|
|
P
|
< 0.05
|
> 0.05
|
< 0.05
|
< 0.05
|
< 0.05
|
- Note: CCRCC clear cell renal cell carcinoma, RAMF renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat, RO renal oncocytoma, MD Mean Diffusivity, FA fractional Anisotropy, MK mean kurtosis (MK), KA kurtosis anisotropy, RK radial kurtosis
- The MD values were higher for RO than for AML (2.93 ± 0.30 vs.1.52 ± 0.24, P < 0.05), while comparable MD values were found between CCRCC and RO (3.08 ± 0.23 vs. 2.93 ± 0.30, P > 0.05)
- The MK, KA and RK values were higher for RO than for CCRCC (0.81 ± 0.08 vs. 0.43 ± 0.08, 0.86 ± 0.16 vs. 0.57 ± 0.16, 0.69 ± 0.08 vs. 0.37 ± 0.11, P < 0.05)
