Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the PET negative and PET positive groups

From: Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma treated by radiofrequency ablation

 

PET negative (n = 110)

PET positive (n = 11)

p value

Age (years)

69 (45–87)

76 (58–83)

0.401

Sex (male/female)

68/42

5/6

0.341

Etiology (HCV/non-HCV)

82/28

9/2

0.730

Fibrosis stage (F0–3/4)

39/71

5/6

0.526

Child–Pugh class (A/B)

87/23

10/1

0.691

Platelets (× 104/μL)

9.0 (2.4–75.9)

10.4 (2.9–21.2)

0.351

ALT (IU/L)

37 (10–171)

45 (16–133)

0.339

Hyaluronic acid (ng/mL)

216.3 (23.2–1851.9)

265.5 (85.0–884.9)

0.438

Type IV collagen 7S (ng/mL)

7.7 (3.0–18.0)

7.3 (4.1–12.9)

0.487

Tumor size (mm)

18 (8–30)

25 (15–30)

0.001

Number of tumors (1/2/3)

91/14/5

8/2/1

0.413

AFP (ng/mL)

16.1 (1.8–1594.5)

112.1 (3.1–1545.8)

0.011

AFP-L3 (%)

7.3 (0–72.5)

28.9 (0–80.0)

0.011

DCP (mAU/mL)

58 (5–9489)

177 (22–2615)

0.008

  1. HCV hepatitis C virus, ALT alanine aminotransferase, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, AFP alpha-fetoprotein, AFP-L3 Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein, DCP Des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin, PET positron emission tomography. Data are expressed as medians (range)