Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of qualitative scores of DWIs using SS-EPI and RS-EPI technique

From: High resolution diffusion-weighted imaging with readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains for determining myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma

parameter

Reader 1(Mean Score ± SD)

P Value a

Reader 2(Mean Score ± SD)

P Value a

SS-EPI

RS-EPI

SS-EPI

RS-EPI

Geometric distortion

4.63 ± 0.556

5.70 ± 0.466

< 0.001

4.80 ± 0.551

5.77 ± 0.430

< 0.001

Image blurring

3.33 ± 0.711

4.70 ± 0.535

< 0.001

3.00 ± 0.743

4.53 ± 0.571

< 0.001

Ghosting artifacts

3.47 ± 0.629

4.97 ± 0.320

< 0.001

3.43 ± 0.626

4.93 ± 0.254

< 0.001

lesion conspicuity

3.53 ± 0.937

4.87 ± 0.730

< 0.001

3.43 ± 1.006

4.80 ± 0.847

< 0.001

Overall image quality

4.50 ± 1.306

7.27 ± 0.868

< 0.001

4.37 ± 1.273

7.10 ± 0.960

< 0.001

  1. DWI diffusion-weighted imaging, SS-EPI single-shot echo-planar imaging, RS-EPI readout-segmented echo-planar imaging, SD standard deviation