Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup analysis for the diagnostic performance of DWI on overall level

From: Utility of diffusion weighted imaging with the quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient in diagnosing residual or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization: a meta-analysis

Characteristic

No.of Studies

Sensitivity

(95% CI)

Specificity

(95% CI)

I2 index of Sensitivity/Specificity

AUC (95% CI)

P Value

All studies

12

0.85(0.74–0.92)

0.83(0.75–0.88)

85.0/65.3

0.90(0.87–0.92)

 

Study design

 Retrospective

5

0.80(0.73–0.86)

0.81(0.71–0.88)

0.00/69.6

0.86(0.83–0.89)

0.68

 Prospective

7

0.91(0.69–0.98)

0.82(0.74–0.88)

92.1/67.5

0.88(0.85–0.90)

 

b value

 < 800

5

0.88(0.69–0.96)

0.92(0.83–0.96)

67.5/0.00

0.93(0.91–0.95)

0.40

 ≥ 800

6

0.85(0.75–0.92)

0.76(0.66–0.83)

58.8/49.2

0.87(0.83–0.89)

 

Threshold method

 visual

6

0.82(0.71–0.89)

0.82(0.67–0.91)

38.663.1

0.88(0.85–0.90)

0.47

 ADC

6

0.87(0.65–0.96)

0.85(0.76–0.91)

92.9/72.7

0.90(0.87–0.92)

 
  1. P value: Comparasion of AUC value between different subgroup analyses