Skip to main content

Table 2 Interrater reliability analysis of v2018 EASL and LI-RADS categories

From: Man or machine? Prospective comparison of the version 2018 EASL, LI-RADS criteria and a radiomics model to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma

LR categories for reviewer 1LR category for reviewer 2κ valueAgreement
LR-1LR-2LR-3LR-4LR-4 VLR-5LR-5 VLR-MLR-MVAll
Agreement on all LR categories
 LR-11200100000130.7437 (0.6644–0.8230)Substantial
 LR-20200000103
 LR-30000000000
 LR-411060600014
 LR-4 V0000020103
 LR-500070118210128
 LR-5 V000002271131
 LR-M001107313328
 LR-MV0000013059
 All133115013635179229
Agreement on LR-5/LR-5 V vs others
Results for reviewer 1Results for reviewer 2  
LR-5/LR-5 VothersAll
LR-5/LR-5 V149101590.6542 (0.5453–0.7631)Substantial
others224870
All17158229
Agreement on LR-4/LR-4 V/LR-5/LR-5 V vs others
Results for reviewer 1Results for reviewer 2  
LR-4/LR-4 V/LR-5/LR-5 VothersAll
LR-4/LR-4 V/LR-5/LR-5 V17061760.7109 (0.5985–0.8233)Substantial
others163753
All18643229
Agreement on EASL v2018
Results for reviewer 1Results for reviewer 2  
01All
04014540.6809 (0.5674–0.7944)Substantial
112163175
All52177229
  1. Abbreviations: LI-RADS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System, EASL European Association for the Study of the Liver, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, LR-4 V LR-TIV in the presence of LR-4 lesions, LR-5 V LR-TIV in the presence of LR-5 lesions, LR-MV LR-TIV in the presence of LR-M lesions