Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | Cancer Imaging

Fig. 5

From: Accurate FDG PET tumor segmentation using the peritumoral halo layer method: a study in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Fig. 5

Regression analyses and Bland-Altman plots of EL, MLPHL, ML2.5, and ML40% versus PL. EL, MLPHL, ML2.5, and ML40% were significantly correlated with PL (a: R2 = 0.5482, p < 0.001; b: R2 = 0.8778, p < 0.001; c: R2 = 8365, p < 0.001; d: R2 = 0.6266, p < 0.001). The standard deviation was smallest between MLPHL and PL (d–f). There was significant proportional error between ML2.5 or ML40% and PL. However, no significant proportional error was found between MLPHL and PL

Back to article page

Cancer Imaging

ISSN: 1470-7330

Contact us