Skip to main content

Table 2 Predictive performance of final models

From: MR radiomics predicts pathological complete response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter study

 

AUC

Accuracy (%)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

Clinical model

      

Training set

0.592 (0.472–0.716)

58.5 (48/82) [53.7–70.7]

74.4 (29/39) [12.8–94.9]

44.1 (19/43) [20.9–100]

54.7 (29/53) [51.0-100]

65.5 (19/29) [55.3–85.7]

Testing set

0.584 (0.441–0.714)

61.6 (45/73) [43.8–75.3]

58.3 (14/24) [16.7–100]

63.3 (31/49) [20.4–98.0]

43.8 (14/32) [36.1–87.5]

75.6 (31/41) [70.3–100]

Radiomics model

      

Training set

0.968 (0.933–0.992)

92.7 (76/82) [87.8–97.6]

87.2 (34/39) [76.9–97.4]

97.7 (42/43) [93.0-100.0]

97.1 (34/35) [91.4–100.0]

89.4 (42/47) [82.4–97.6]

Testing set

0.885 (0.800-0.958)

82.2 (60/73) [72.6–90.4]

75.0 (18/24) [58.3–91.7]

85.7 (42/49) [75.5–96.0]

72.0 (18/25) [58.6–89.5]

87.5 (42/48) [80.0-95.5]

  1. Data in parentheses are numerators and denominators, with 95% CIs in brackets. AUC, area under the curve; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value