Skip to main content

Table 2 Localization of macrovascular tumour invasion (n = 124) and changes during follow-up (n = 83) according to therapeutic anticoagulation

From: Management of varices but not anticoagulation is associated with improved outcome in patients with HCC and macrovascular tumour invasion

Patient characteristics

Study cohort,

n = 124 (100%)

Anticoagulation,

n = 24 (19%)

No anticoagulation,

n = 100 (81%)

p-value

Localization and degree of occlusion, n (%)

 Main portal vein involved

47 (38%)

14 (58%)

33 (33%)

0.022

  Total

19 (15%)

6 (25%)

13 (13%)

0.069

  Partial

28 (23%)

8 (33%)

20 (20%)

 Left and/or right portal branch

53 (43%)

8 (33%)

45 (45%)

0.299

  Total

25 (20%)

2 (8%)

23 (23%)

0.272

  Partial

28 (23%)

6 (25%)

22 (22%)

 Left and/or right portal branch and other veins (hepatic veins, splenic vein, VCI, SMV)

17 (14%)

2 (8%)

15 (15%)

0.522

  Total

7 (6%)

2 (8%)

5 (5%)

0.237

  Partial

10 (8%)

–

10 (10%)

 Other veins (hepatic veins, splenic vein, VCI, SMV)

7 (6%)

–

7 (7%)

0.344

  Total

7 (6%)

–

7 (7%)

  Apposition thrombus

49 (40%)

12 (50%)

37 (37%)

0.242

  Venous congestion

22 (18%)

5 (21%)

17 (17%)

0.766

Best radiological response of macrovascular tumour invasion at 3–6 months, n (%)

All patients with available FU imaging,

n = 83 (100%)

Anticoagulation,

n = 17 (20%)

No anticoagulation,

n = 66 (80%)

p-value

 Regression

14 (17%)

3 (18%)

11 (17%)

0.951

 Stabilization

32 (39%)

7 (41%)

25 (38%)

 Progression

37 (45%)

7 (41%)

30 (45%)

  1. Abbreviations: FU follow-up, SMV superior mesenteric vein, VCI vena cava inferior