Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance comparison of different feature fusion techniques on the internal validation set, independent test set 1, and independent test set 2

From: Predicting occult lymph node metastasis in solid-predominantly invasive lung adenocarcinoma across multiple centers using radiomics-deep learning fusion model

Model

Feature Fusion

Internal Validation Set

Independent Test Set 1

Independent Test Set 2

aAUC (SD)

Radiomics

None

0.810

0.644

0.679

0.715 (0.019)

Deep Learning

None

0.746

0.717

0.623

0.676 (0.021)

Radiomics-Deep Learning Fusion

Additiona

0.795

0.663

0.736

0.736 (0.018)

Learnable Additiona

0.793

0.677

0.748

0.740 (0.017)

Concatenationa

0.790

0.697

0.743

0.737 (0.018)

Concatenation

0.813

0.758

0.728

0.754 (0.018)

  1. Performance was reported in terms of AUC. Radiomics employed the support vector machine model, while deep learning utilized the pre-trained ResNet-18 model
  2. aBefore feature fusion, the radiomics features were mapped to the same dimension as the deep learning features