Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnosis efficiency of different machine learning algorithms in training groups

From: CT radiomics based on different machine learning models for classifying gross tumor volume and normal liver tissue in hepatocellular carcinoma

 

AUC

Sensitivity

Specificity

Adaboost

0.9973(0.9962,0.9975,0.9986)

0.9748(0.9647,0.9762,0.9878)

0.9804(0.9750,0.9875,0.9880)

Xgboost

0.9945(0.9911,0.9954,0.9969)

0.9612(0.9529,0.9643,0.9647)

0.9747(0.9747,0.9756,0.9759)

SVM

0.9935(0.9915,0.9928,0.9955)

0.9632(0.9529,0.9639,0.9643)

0.9625(0.9524,0.9639,0.9643)

RF

0.9975(0.9972,0.9987,0.9994)

0.9855(0.9762,0.9880,1.0000)

0.9860(0.9765,0.9880,1.0000)

logistic

0.9880(0.9847,0.9867,0.9904)

0.9522(0.9398,0.9512,0.9634)

0.9457(0.9398,0.9412,0.9524)

naivebayes

0.9732(0.9692,0.9720,0.9765)

0.9222(0.9143,0.9178,0.9296)

0.8174(0.7959,0.8061,0.8280)

 

NPV

PPV

MCC

Adaboost

0.9744(0.9639,0.9759,0.9880)

0.9803(0.9759,0.9880,0.9881)

0.9549(0.9402,0.9524,0.9759)

Xgboost

0.9605(0.9518,0.9639,0.9643)

0.9750(0.9759,0.9759,0.9762)

0.9357(0.9280,0.9398,0.9407)

SVM

0.9632(0.9524,0.9639,0.9643)

0.9624(0.9518,0.9639,0.9643)

0.9257(0.9157,0.9277,0.9398)

RF

0.9853(0.9759,0.9880,1.0000)

0.9858(0.9759,0.9880,1.0000)

0.9713(0.9639,0.9759,0.9880)

logistic

0.9524(0.9398,0.9518,0.9639)

0.9453(0.9398,0.9405,0.9518)

0.8978(0.8797,0.8923,0.9159)

naivebayes

0.9336(0.9277,0.9286,0.9398)

0.7900(0.7590,0.7738,0.8072)

0.7316(0.7003,0.7184,0.7445)

  1. #Data outside and inside the brackets indicate the mean and first, median, and third quartiles of the results, respectively, for five-fold cross-validation iterated 200 times.