Table 3 Diagnostic performance of each pancreas CT protocol in predicting margin-negative (R0) resection
| Â | Â | Standard CT | High-resolution CT | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Reader 1 | AUC | 0.714 (0.593, 0.816) | 0.739 (0.619, 0.837) | 0.646 |
Sensitivity | 76.5% (39/51) | 72.5% (37/51) | 0.500 | |
Specificity | 50.0% (9/18) | 72.2% (13/18) | 0.219 | |
Accuracy | 69.6% (48/69) | 72.5% (50/69) | 0.727 | |
Reader 2 | AUC | 0.702 (0.580, 0.806) | 0.728 (0.607, 0.828) | 0.682 |
Sensitivity | 86.3% (44/51) | 82.4% (42/51) | 0.500 | |
Specificity | 33.3% (6/18) | 38.9% (7/18) | 0.999 | |
Accuracy | 72.5% (50/69) | 71.0% (49/69) | 0.999 | |
Reader 3 | AUC | 0.680 (0.557, 0.787) | 0.714 (0.593, 0.816) | 0.359 |
Sensitivity | 74.5% (38/51) | 64.7% (33/51) | 0.125 | |
Specificity | 44.4% (8/18) | 72.2% (13/18) | 0.063 | |
Accuracy | 66.7% (46/69) | 66.7% (46/69) | 0.999 | |
Pooled analysis | AUC | 0.699 (0.582, 0.816) | 0.727 (0.605, 0.849) | 0.128 |
Sensitivity | 79.1% (66.8%, 91.3%) | 73.2% (56.7%, 89.7%) | 0.096 | |
Specificity | 42.6% (21.0%, 64.2%) | 61.1% (24.9%, 97.4%) | 0.081 | |
Accuracy | 69.6% (60.3%, 78.8%) | 70.0% (61.4%, 83.4%) | 0.834 |