Fig. 2From: Discrepancies of assessments in a RECIST 1.1 phase II clinical trial – association between adjudication rate and variability in images and tumors selectionExample of one non-measurable lesion. Both readers targeted the same region of interest, but their perception of tumors’ boundary was. One reader (right) considered the hepatic tumor as coalescent, while the other (left) considered two distinct tumors. The inter-reader proportional difference was 73%. It should be noted that readers enabled different window levelsBack to article page