Skip to main content

Table 3 Histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (after excluding steatosis lesions), the ADC histogram parameters, Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient, and one-way ANOVA with the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test

From: 3D analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient histograms in hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grade

 

Well diff HCC

Mod diff HCC

Poor diff HCC

Pearson’s correlation coefficient

Pearson’s correlation coefficient P value

ANOVA Tukey-Kramer post hoc test

Mean

1071 ± 178

1004 ± 157

967 ± 176

−0.164

0.281

n.s.

Standard deviation

147 ± 86

196 ± 89

243 ± 76

0.290

0.053

n.s.

Minimum

738 ± 322

421 ± 271

221 ± 110

−0.469

0.001*

0.006**

Maximum

1588 ± 493

1787 ± 579

1808 ± 606

0.201

0.186

n.s.

Mode

582 ± 531

890 ± 281

799 ± 347

0.122

0.425

n.s.

Skewness

0.91 ± 1.40

0.54 ± 0.84

0.59 ± 0.94

−0.073

0.633

n.s.

Kurtosis

5.39 ± 5.45

5.10 ± 3.38

5.50 ± 3.61

0.017

0.912

n.s.

5th percentile

910 ± 187

734 ± 181

631 ± 158

−0.382

0.010*

0.03***

50th percentile

1042 ± 163

997 ± 154

934 ± 160

−0.192

0.205

n.s.

75th percentile

1139 ± 222

1119 ± 173

1089 ± 199

−0.078

0.610

n.s.

90th percentile

1218 ± 217

1244 ± 219

1271 ± 260

0.065

0.672

n.s.

  1. Well diff HCC: Well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma
  2. Mod diff HCC: Moderately differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma
  3. Poor diff HCC: Poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma
  4. *, **, *** P < 0.05
  5. n.s. no significant difference
  6. **Tukey-Kramer post hoc test: Well diff HCC vs Mod diff HCC, P = 0.187; Well diff HCC vs Poor diff HCC, P = 0.045; Mod diff HCC vs Poor diff HCC, P = 0.008
  7. ***Tukey-Kramer post hoc test: Well diff HCC vs Mod diff HCC, P = 0.110; Well diff HCC vs Poor diff HCC, P = 0.023; Mod diff HCC vs Poor diff HCC, P = 0.317