Skip to main content

Table 4 Correlation Analysis – Body Diameter/Radiation Dose (the asterisk* marked part should be evaluated with caution because of low patient count)

From: Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT

  

Patients

CTDIvol (mGy)

Total mAs

Body Diam. sag

Body diam. Transv.

Spearman correlation coefficient (rho) – lateral diameter/CTDIvol

Spearman correlation coefficient (rho) – transverse diameter/CTDIvol

Group 1

Patients 100 kV

30

8.9 (5.8–14.6)

217 (179–355)

32.5 (27.1–41.2)

21.2 (14.9–30.4)

0.80

0.89

Patients 120 kV

16

10.8 (7.1–17.4)

213 (152–257)

34.1 (27.9–45.8)

24.4 (16.7–35.1)

0.81

0.83

Patients 140 kV

4

20.9 (20.1–22.8)

218 (204–232)

43.8 (39.8–48.4)

29.5 (24.7–31.5)

0.65*

0.32*

Group 2

Patients 90 kV

19

4.8 (3.9–9.8)

165.0 (134.0–338.0)

34.5 (31.9–39.0)

20.4 (18.2–24.3)

0.71

0.43

Patients 100 kV

23

6.3 (5.3–9.0)

156.0 (130.0–224.0)

38.0 (32.3–44.1)

21.6 (12.2–27.3)

0.68

0.71

Patients 110 kV

3

9.7 (6.6–14.1)

185.0 (125.0–270.0)

40.4 (30.7–47.4)

22.7 (17.6–33.0)

1.0 *

1.0 *

Patients 120 kV

4

11.5 (7.8–14.4)

171.0 (106.0–189.0)

37.8 (33.4–41.4)

23.1 (18.9–28.0)

0.2 *

1.0 *

Patients 150 kV

1

22.01

192.0

42.2

28.7

N/A

N/A